I've said this before in relation to the DVD in Motion debate, and I think it warrants mention again.
From the original post you cannot deduce whether Pullstarter intends using spacers on his Tig just to see what the wheels look like (so you're right, you would need to be clairvoyant to pick that up) or whether he intended to use them on the road (although you were apparently clairvoyant to pick that up
- just taking a humourous dig at you).
Pullstarter stated something, another poster questioned the legality, and the OP then responded in such a manner as to indicate he was aware there was a legal issue at play but did not see the relevance. Duty of care by those in the know is therefore complete... there was no need to continue to drive the point home any further IMO.
Granted, the added info on the pitfalls of spacers outside of just the legal are interesting, as I hadn't considered the load bearing of the lip, but once again it was put across in a dramatised "assume you're going to be in the worst possible circumstances when it happens" manner rather that just stating the facts or giving friendly advice.
All in all, the legal/insurance/etc points are valid, were noted, and let's just move on from there. I understand where Pullstarters frustration is coming from, but I also appreciate your concern as a citizen using the public roads you felt there was a risk of the spacers being used on. I think we all get the idea here so let's move along... nothing to see here
Bookmarks