RACQ small four wheel drive road test

[Dilusi]

Last week I received my RACQ magazine which had a “Small four wheel drive road test”. The test compared the diesel versions of Hyundai Santa Fe, Nissan X trail, Renault Koleos, Skoda Octavia scout, and VW Tiguan.

It is interesting that the Tiguan is billed as the “cheapest” of the bunch.

The Tiguan topped (or equalled) each category reviewed except for off road. Tiguan’s ratings:

• Value for money 3.5 stars
• Design and function 4 stars
• On the road 4.5 stars
• Off Road 3 stars
• Overall 4.5 stars

One thing that surprised me is that the Tiguan’s estimated servicing costs to 75000 km, and tyres ,brakes etc costs were the lowest of the group.

Overall the comment was the Tiguan “struts close to all round capability rather than go anywhere specialty. It suggests that with the off road technology pack, “it would make the cheapest vehicle on test also the best”. (I think they mean best in every category as it rated the best overall in the review without the off road pack ).

Re off road, I am more interested in on-road or soft-road activities than hard core off road so the off road comments are not too hard to live with. BTW, I would love to read of experiences of anyone's experiences with the off road technology.

[Transporter]

The off road technology must be worthwhile just for the tyre pressure monitoring.alone.

[Dilusi]

The off road technology must be worthwhile just for the tyre pressure monitoring.alone.

For $300, I agree. (The tyre pressure monitoring also comes standard on the 147TSI)

[clip]

I reckon it's a load of codswallop!

These reviews give me the proverbial !@@#'s!

The thing that really interests me is the Koreans again coming in for a call. Have any of you ever driven a 5 year old Korean vehicle? Even the Hyundai salesman told me don't ever keep one for more than 4 years! And that was only last year.

I'm sorry but it was just another typical review where they try to placate all manufactures by not making anything stand out too much. I really dislike bike and car reviews with a passion - so contrived, so lacking objectivity that they're not worth the paper they're written on, or the bandwidth they take up.

Rant over!

[Dilusi]

Even the Hyundai salesman told me ...

If the Hyundai salesman said it, it must be true

[team_v]

I have to agree with clip.

In order to save face and prevent costly legal issues due to defamation and loss of sales, most/all car reviews will give every car tested a good rap without giving a "truthful" comparison.

The best bet is to actually talk to someone who has owned one or search for specific forums.

[WannaTig]

I don't think I've ever read a 'bad' review of a car. From someone presumably paid to write it, that is!

I read just about every one I could Google before signing up for a Tig, what struck me was that hardly any mentioned the crappy space saver tyre. Why not I wonder.

Especially for a car with offroad capability?

Obviously not a dealbreaker for me, still waiting (not so) patiently for mine to arrive but seemed odd just to not mention it at all. Maybe a case of the writer observing if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all.

[Dilusi]

I read just about every one I could Google before signing up for a Tig, what struck me was that hardly any mentioned the crappy space saver tyre. Why not I wonder.

You got me thinking - I put - tiguan space saver - in google and found there were lots of references to space savers in reviews. eg "The Tiguan's space-saver spare wheel is also impractical" "The same can't be said for its space-saver spare, which is annoying enough on a road-orientated car and even more so in a vehicle that's expected to encounter dirt now and then." "the space saver wheel instead of a proper spare wheel will have its detractors"

I wonder if once we make up our mind if we rationalise or overlook the negative things in favour on the positives?

On another note, based on consumer reviews, the Tiguan was Edmunds Consumers' Top Rated SUV Under $25,000 for 2009
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/consu...009/index.html
Note to Clip please do not look at the top rated SUV $25K-$35K (It comes from "K").

[Sanman]

I read just about every one I could Google before signing up for a Tig, what struck me was that hardly any mentioned the crappy space saver tyre. Why not I wonder.

Space Saver Spares hit the holy trinity of car manufacturing: lower cost, lower weight, less space. Its the new norm.

[clip]

Note to Clip please do not look at the top rated SUV $25K-$35K (It comes from "K").

Don't worry mate, I wouldn't even give them the satisfaction of just one little extra web hit . It's all crap.

And it goes for the reviews on the Tig too. I did read some on the Tig before I bought it , but nearly everything I read was crap and didn't give me any indication of what sort of car it was - everything was so similar to everything else in the reviews that they might as well have given the best award to the one with the nicest colour range or the trendiest looking badges!

Honestly, I can't remember the last time I read a constructive, truthful and objective car or bike review.