Why does the "bogus" tuning figures bollocks come up every time there's a few APR haters around. I must have posted this dyno graph at least 6 times now and still the haters come on with no proof, well here is positive proof;
Allowing for drive train loss APR's figures are absolutely spot on. I'm more than happy with mine and it's embarrassed quite a few so called "performance" cars.
Can we please stop the "my tune can piss further than your tune" bull**** and stick to providing some useful information?
2008 VRS Wagon. Yellow, very yellow!
Forever blowing bubbles.
I think this says it all.
With respect to the OP, this is all based on the his perception of how the car should feel after being flashed. The above quote may indicate the expectation is unrealistic, no way is a Tig going to perform as well as a GTI given the diffeence in weight.
In reality the logical course of action is to dyno the car in stock mode and again in flashed mode. If the figures show there is little difference, then he is entitled to post publicly his disappointment.
Cheers
George
06 Jetta 2.0TFSI Killed by a Lexus!
09 Eos 2.0TSI DSG Loved this car but has now gone to a new home!!
14 EOS 2.0 TSI has arrived!
Are you talking about a stock GTI or chipped (remapped) GTI? If you're talking stock GTI, the APR remapped Tig will do a stock GTI all day everyday, from standing start to hill climbs, to 'other' tests that good sense I wouldn't discuss here. I know, because I got tired having GTIs trying all the time. There's someone on the GTI forum here that could atest to what I'm saying as on more than one occasion he tried it on against the Tig.
But not just GTI's. I had runs with lots of others. Had a run with an XR6 where it was legal to do so. He followed me back when I pulled over and couldn't believe what I was in. He could not keep up, let alone get away. So my point being there is no way my APR mapped Tig did not perform significantly better (immensly TBH) with the remap.
But if you're talking about a remapped GTI v remapped Tig, then of course not- although it might give it a run off the line.
The only thing I can think is that the later Tigs aren't getting the same increase as the earlier ones for some reason?
The OP stated My interpretation is that he is referring to a chipped GTI Vs a chipped Tig. Given the output of a chipped Tig is virtually identical to a chipped GTI and a Tig is heavier, no way will a Tig be or feel as quick as a GTI. It would be a bit like me chipping my Eos and complaining it is not as quick as a GTI....of course not, it's 150 Kg heavier.
Cheers
George
06 Jetta 2.0TFSI Killed by a Lexus!
09 Eos 2.0TSI DSG Loved this car but has now gone to a new home!!
14 EOS 2.0 TSI has arrived!
Bookmarks