Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Car performance measuring devices

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    639
    Users Country Flag

    Car performance measuring devices

    This is not directly relevant to Tiguans, but I know some members are using these performance monitoring boxes..

    Can someone comment on accuracy and recommend relatively low cost device to measure acceleration of cars.

    I am looking at Vbox(expensive) and Gtech pro.. Can some one comment on those.. Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    1,250
    Users Country Flag
    1/4 mile strip would be cheaper, accurate and legal

    Or dyno runs if u prefer raw data.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    I believe the Polar FIS allows 0-100 and a range of other options integrated into the MFD.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    1,250
    Users Country Flag
    the cheapest would be a Torque Pro App (on an android phone, us$5) and a bluetooth dongle (around us$15 eBay delivered). the accuracy is probably not the best though..
    Mitsubishi Pajero Sport - Super Select 2WD/4WD
    Toyota 86 GTS Performance Pack Moon Slate - RWD
    MINI Cooper S Clubman - FWD

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by nat225 View Post
    the cheapest would be a Torque Pro App (on an android phone, us$5) and a bluetooth dongle (around us$15 eBay delivered). the accuracy is probably not the best though..
    That is the biggest issue i believe.
    You have to get a strong GPS signal with a quick refresh rate (I have heard 5Hz bantered around) in order to get an accurate reading.
    I don't know if the gps antenna with the RNS510 is even that good.
    Last edited by team_v; 15-07-2013 at 07:00 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    639
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by team_v View Post
    That is the biggest issue i believe.
    You have to get a strong GPS signal with a quick refresh rate (I have heard 5Hz bantered around) in order to get an accurate reading.
    I don't know if the gps antenna with the RNS510 is even that good.
    Yes ... I used that setup ( Torque pro/ dongle) and it sometimes give very confusing results.. Torque pro uses OBD2 signals from car ecu for 0 ~ 100 timing I believe but not sure...Also it does not give any result for some runs.

    Gtech pro is relatively cheap not sure about the accuracy though..
    Last edited by Ramee; 15-07-2013 at 08:45 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    639
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    566
    I've found the RaceLogic Performance Box / Video Box / VBox products to be suitably accurate tools, though they're not cheap ($500+).

    I use mine primarily for racetrack lap times where the GPS lap time is usually within 1/10th of the Natsoft recorded, transponder-based time. Not F1 accuracy but more than sufficient for my needs.

    For straight line acceleration runs I've found them to be pretty accurate also - again within a few tenths of the laser recorded times over various 800m and 1000m standing sprint events.

    The older Performance Box I've got is a 10Hz unit - i.e. it gets an updated GPS fix every 1/10th of a second, and uses fancy maths to calculate splits between those fixes. Their newer models now support 20Hz (i.e. 1/20th of a second) updates.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Semaphore, SA
    Posts
    8,708
    Quote Originally Posted by jamesatfish View Post
    I've found the RaceLogic Performance Box / Video Box / VBox products to be suitably accurate tools, though they're not cheap ($500+).

    I use mine primarily for racetrack lap times where the GPS lap time is usually within 1/10th of the Natsoft recorded, transponder-based time. Not F1 accuracy but more than sufficient for my needs.

    For straight line acceleration runs I've found them to be pretty accurate also - again within a few tenths of the laser recorded times over various 800m and 1000m standing sprint events.

    The older Performance Box I've got is a 10Hz unit - i.e. it gets an updated GPS fix every 1/10th of a second, and uses fancy maths to calculate splits between those fixes. Their newer models now support 20Hz (i.e. 1/20th of a second) updates.
    James,

    How do you find these compare to the AutoPolar? Have you run any comparisons using the AutoPolar FIS+ for 0-100?

    Be interested in any "real world" results.

    I've found my 0-100 times are quite repeatable using the Autopolar but not sure how accurate they are.

    2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

    2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
    2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
    2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold)
    - Tigger73's 125TSI Build



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    566

    Quote Originally Posted by tigger73 View Post
    James,

    How do you find these compare to the AutoPolar? Have you run any comparisons using the AutoPolar FIS+ for 0-100?

    Be interested in any "real world" results.

    I've found my 0-100 times are quite repeatable using the Autopolar but not sure how accurate they are.
    I actually haven't thought to compare the AutoPolar and the Performance Box - will grab the PB out of the Polo sometime this week and give it a try.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |