Support VWWC

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Premium fuel vs Regular fuel

  1. #1

    Premium fuel vs Regular fuel

    I want to know is there any benefit(Mileage wise, Performance wise) of Premium fuel instead regular fuel.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Pacific Paradise QLD
    Posts
    7,398
    Users Country Flag
    Well as VW specify it the difference may well be that running lower grade may stuff your motor.

    Im not game to try.

    Interestingly in the USA the standard grade is only 87 Octane and in one place 86. Premium is 91. Must be slightly different rating to here perhaps. Maybe a US member can tell us.

    I did 13700km in a rental Hyundai Tucson and it went like the clappers on it.
    2021 Kamiq LE 110 , Moon White, BV cameras F & B
    Mamba Ebike to replace Tiguan

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    VW requires a minimum of 95 Ron.
    I would reccomend 98 Ron as it is better for the car and the cost difference is marginal.

    If the car is tuned or has a high output it should only run 98 Ron.



    The US has a completel different system where they have 91 compared to our 95 and 93 compared to our 98.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Pacific Paradise QLD
    Posts
    7,398
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by team_v View Post
    VW requires a minimum of 95 Ron.
    I would reccomend 98 Ron as it is better for the car and the cost difference is marginal.

    If the car is tuned or has a high output it should only run 98 Ron.
    The US has a completel different system where they have 91 compared to our 95 and 93 compared to our 98.
    Cost is over 10c a litre where we buy it but cheaper than a new motor LOL

    Yep thats the ratings in US rental company said run it on the cheapest so I did
    2021 Kamiq LE 110 , Moon White, BV cameras F & B
    Mamba Ebike to replace Tiguan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kilsyth, VIC
    Posts
    6,310
    Users Country Flag
    I haven't done the tests in a long while (and not in a modern VW), but everytime I have done it in the past it works out that 98 gets more KM per tank and the cost difference works out to be almost NIL or slightly in your favour AND you get to have cleaner burning fuel which is theoretically better for your car...

    So at no additional cost in the long term, it's a no brainer for me.


    If it has an engine or heartbeat it's going to cost you. | Refer a Friend - AussieBroadband $50 Credit

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    264
    Users Country Flag
    Engines are designed to perform at specific octane rating. Most Europeans require 95RON as that is the lowest RON fuel that is available in the EU.

    Running your engine on a lower RON fuel may cause your engine to detonate or ping especially under load and acceleration. Most engines can compensate for a lower RON than specified. This should be used only in emergency and only to get you to a petrol station with the correct fuel. Long term use may cause severe engine issues, even failure.

    Running your engine on a higher RON fuel may or may not provide any improvement in terms of power or fuel economy.

    Premium fuels, especially diesels may or may not contain fuel injector cleaners and other magic potions.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    424
    Users Country Flag
    tested this many times, 98 gives better fuel economy. Tests were done on TV show 5th gear and only Shell 98 had better performance. I am on my 5th car and will only use 98.
    Current - 2015 Tiguan 155 R-Line.
    Previous - Jetta MkV 147 Turbo, Viezu Raceday mapped, Carbonio CAI, Quad Exhaust System, R8 Coil pack, Whiteline Swaybar, GTi Steering wheel with paddles, Alloy pedals, RNS510 & Leather.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    287
    Users Country Flag
    +1 on all the feedback provided, 98 no brainer....

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    199
    Users Country Flag
    The difference here in Orange is 5c. I haven't noticed any difference between the two. The other point is that 95 is a high turnover at some stations and 98 can be a slow mover and goes stale at the station and no better than 95. The other factor locally is there is no discounting and price cycles so fuel is always at the premium end of the cycle. I see price differences of up to 25c when I go to Sydney.
    08 MY09 R32, DBP, DSG, GIAC, R8V10 reps, KW V3, RNS510/VIM/BT/MDI, region free DVD, switched Haldex, s2t paddles,HPA dogbone rubber,Mk7 climatronics, FIS+, Adams/RDA discs & Hawk pads, Garage button, GruppeM. Front fogs, Milltek. CF Chin spoiler.Strut support. LEDs Alloy front suspension bits.....
    http://photobucket.com/gregsr32

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bundoora, Victoria
    Posts
    1,002
    Users Country Flag

    Didn't see too much of a difference between 95 and 98 for fuel economy. I've always filled up 98 at BP, is Shell any better? Is there really a difference between the two 98's?
    Past - '95 VW Golf MK3 VR6
    Present - '11 Ford Focus LW Diesel (PSA DW10C)

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |