One of the features of a forum like this one is that it enables anyone to have and express an opinion, no matter how well (or ill) thought out it is. We should always show respect for this feature, and at the same time show respect for the other users of the forum. Generally this is not a problem here (in my experience) as VW owners are by and large thoughtful people; otherwise they would not have bought a VW!
That being the case, I was a bit disturbed by the apparent tone of the above post – being rather personal in nature in its suggestion that I am not telling the truth (referring to a standard for biodiesel) and also dismissively implying recklessness or at least poor judgement on my behalf in my choice of fuel (with the last two sentences). Now maybe I am being a mite sensitive here, but I have left it a week before responding…
Mr Tuff,
I see that you are a relative newcomer to this forum, as your profile shows that the above post was your second of a total of four contributions you have made. Welcome to VWWatercooled! Please add some details to your signature so everyone can see your “credentials” eg what model of VW you have and with a name like “TouaregTuff” probably what model of Touareg you have. If you don’t have one of these vehicles, no matter, everyone is welcome… you can put “Honda zot” or “H1 Hummer” in your sig if that is what you drive.
Now let’s look at the two points you made in your post.
- About an Australian Standard for Biodiesel. Where can you read about it?
The easiest thing is to google “Australian Standard Biodiesel”. The very first article referred to if you do this is:Biodiesel fuel quality standard which is a link to the website of the relevant Australian Govt Dept website. From there, it is not hard to find the summary of the chemical and physical properties page http://www.environment.gov.au/atmosphere/fuelquality/standards/biodiesel/summary.html . So the standard exists.- I “risk engine damage to save a few cents”??
First let’s look at this thread, and the questions I was answering. I was not advocating the “saving of a few cents” but answering a specific question from an earlier poster about whether the specific price differential between petro-diesel and biodiesel at the time of the comparison would cover VW’s recommendation of more frequent fuel filter changes. Whether you save a few cents or spend a few more on the price of a litre of fuel is a matter of world market conditions etc etc, and if you look at biodiesel the factors include the export price of canola, the drought in inland Australia, and not just the usual ones of international oil speculators, arab dictatorships, the US military, and multinational oil company greed. At the time I wrote my post, the factory gate price for biodiesel locally to me had just gone up from $1.50 to $1.60, and retail diesel fuel was selling for approximately $1.89.
As for risking engine damage – bad fuel can possibly cause engine damage. This is true of fuel from any source, be it “bio” or “petro” in origin. You can rest assured that diesel engines are able to run on biodiesel without the "bio" damaging them. (If your diesel was made before 1995 you should replace various rubber seals in your fuel system before trying). I assume that “bad” biodiesel can damage an engine, as “bad” petro-diesel probably can. Certainly VW had no problem when my engine was produced in stating that it was suitable for biodiesel, even if their Australian subsidiary was not up with that. As my earlier post said, there is a whole chapter on the use of biodiesel in my owners manual. In fact, there is a fair bit of evidence that biodiesel is probably better for the engine in that it has natural lubrication properties – sadly lacking in the modern “ultra-low sulphur” diesel now sold in Australia. Caltex adds 2% biodiesel to return some lubricity to its diesel.
Where the “not for biodiesel” status of the newer VW’s comes from is the introduction of the diesel particle filter in the exhaust, as the testing for compliance with newer Euro environmental standards was signed off using petro-diesel.- On the subject of “risking engine damage” I note that your earlier post includes a positive comment regarding a “dpchip”. I have one of them too. It is not a great risk of damaging the engine, but of the two, I’d say installing a dpchip and cranking it up to full output will put more stress on the engine than using biodiesel.
cheers
Bookmarks