2.0l 16v Engine differences

[h100vw]

I have had both engines, one in a Passat Wagon the other in a MK3 Golf. The ABF is the one to have hands down. A far superior engine, VW quit developing the 9A for a good reason, the ABF was better.

Throttle response is like a MK1 and with a chip it'll do 170bhp or so.

Gavin

[Bora Sport]

My understanding is that the 9A was basically for the American market where torque is king. It had roughly the same horsepower as the KR but heaps more torque lower in the rev range. They also did a torquier version of the KR (1. for America which is known as the PL. It had around 122hp as I recall. I think Dave DOHC has one in his Mk 1 and it goes quite nicely. No doubt there are other variations. I had a 9A in my Mk 2 (converted from a KR). It ran out of puff at about 6500rpm whereas the KR revved to the limiter around 8000rpm.

The 9A was far superior in day to day driving though and for in gear performance the 9A would run away and hide from the KR. My mate put the KR cams into a 9A plus the KR inlet manifold and got an instant 155hp.

I had my Beeza on the dyno yesterday and it ran 91.6 kW at the wheels and it is absolutely stock. My 9A with slightly higher compression than standard and a VSAM on it ran 81 kW on the same type of but different dyno with everthing stock including exhaust.

[Valver.]

These are the main differences:

- ABF has a tall block, 9a has a short
- ABF has 159mm rods and 21mm wrist pins, 9a has 144mm and 20mm pins
- ABF has a 52mm inlet manifold, 9a has a 50mm or 42mm depending on which motor you find and whether or not anyone has tinkered with it
- ABF has a single butterfly throttle body, not a twin
- ABF has 10.5:1 compression, 9a 10.8:1
- ABF has Digifant 3 EFI, 9a has mechanical fuel injection
- ABF has longer valve stems, different combustion chambers and slightly different shaped ports; it also has VR6-style retainers and slightly lighter lifters
- ABF cams have longer lift and duration
- ABF uses a longer timing belt
- ABF uses a serpentine belt setup for the alternator, water pump etc, rather than a V-belt like the other 16vs. It's smoother and quieter basically
- ABF cam cover is different - the two centre mounts are counter sunk into the cover rather than on top
- ABF uses a coilpack for ignition and has a 90deg. angle on the distributor cap
- ABF was sold right up until MY99 in the SEATs, though most of the blocks are stamped 96, so should theoretically have lower mileage

- That's all I can remember off the top of my head, but there are other differences with knock sensors etc

[barrygti]

Ok thanks so much for all that guys, so next question is, does the taller block ABF fit straight in to a Mk1 like a 9a?

Plan is to turbo it, so if the 9a is tourqier then I suppose ABF would be better as turbo will fill in midrange anyway....... just ABF's are hard to find in New Zealand......

[ausgolfer]

Valver is the person to ask, as his mk1 has an ABF in it, I remember reading about a lot of the guys have height issues in the UK back in the day with ABF's in mk1's but there's obvioously ways around it.

[finemk1]

ive found you need a kr sump and oil pump when putting a tall block in a mk1, tends to hangs down a bit, if your car is standard hieght it might be ok.. and like usual u will need all the 16v mounts and what not

[aprr32]

The block is taller at the top not at bottom, that why the exhaust down pipe is longer and bonnets are closer.