Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Rocco Vs Competitors

Threaded View

Vwphile Rocco Vs Competitors 11-02-2012, 11:20 AM
Mac135 Not quite sure why you think... 11-02-2012, 11:51 AM
Andych I have to agree with... 11-02-2012, 11:58 AM
Mac135 I think the Golf R a genuine... 11-02-2012, 12:04 PM
Andych Personally... I thought the... 11-02-2012, 04:29 PM
entice You must have sat in a LWB... 11-02-2012, 04:55 PM
Vwphile MX5 and Roc are two door fun... 11-02-2012, 02:26 PM
Mac135 [QUOTE=Vwphile;775153] ok... 11-02-2012, 05:00 PM
BS_roc I recently went through the... 25-06-2012, 08:04 PM
Prodigy I fully agree with... 28-06-2012, 06:17 PM
triode12 I have driven both the Rocco... 11-02-2012, 04:21 PM
Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,224
    Quote Originally Posted by Vwphile View Post
    I've test driven the Rocco and agree with all the comments I've read on this forum. It has great performance, handles as if its on rails. I absolutely love the exhaust burble as it changes up through the gears in the DSG version.

    So I'm a convert.

    But just to make sure I haven't missed any obvious competitors (apart from its own siblings) have any you driven either the
    Renault Megane Cup 250
    Mazda MX5
    Mini Cooper S

    and how they compare with the Roc

    Would greatly appreciate your thoughts.

    Also manual VS DSG in the Rocco?
    I have driven both the Rocco (DSG) and Renault 250 Cup Trophee (manual of course).
    Technically speaking the Renault would beat the Rocco in terms of handling esp on the twisties. This is the car you want to get if you plan to go on the track a lot. BUT...I personally would get the Rocco because I don't go to the track that often and would get bored driving the 250 as a daily - the 250 just isn't fun to drive. You have to push the 250 a lot more, hence to license losing speeds to get the same fun feeling you get from the Rocco at legal speeds. The 250 is just too composed/too good - you don't get the feeling of speed till you get over 140 km/hr.

    Also, the 250 feels cheap on the inside compared to the Rocco. The only redeeming feature of the 250 is the v.cool built-in telemetry ala Nissan GT-R. Not to forget the very bad reputation for reliability and resale value of the frog brands.


    .

    ---------- Post added at 05:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:19 PM ----------

    [QUOTE=Vwphile;775153]
    Quote Originally Posted by Mac135 View Post
    Not quite sure why you think an MX5 is a competitor

    MX5 and Roc are two door fun cars that handle well and are at Similar price point. Admittedly, one drives from the front and the other from the rear, the MX5 is a 2 seater but I won't be carrying more than one passanger anyway so not a deal breaker

    You also forgot that one is turbo charged while the other is NA.
    I would drive both and make up your mind. The NC MX5 is due to be superceeded next year. So you might get a good runout deal on one if you wait till the end of the year.
    Last edited by triode12; 11-02-2012 at 04:27 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |