Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: OEM airbox with K&N pod

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    918

    OEM airbox with K&N pod

    Recently I have noticed my fuel consumption has dropped ,currently I avg 12.5L/100 daily, 17.5L/100 floored around the block and heavy traffic 22.5L/100

    I am not expecting this is going to give me much a difference, but a $6 Experiment wouldn;t hurt.

    So I bought a 3inch "L" shaped PVC from bunnings pressure fitted into OEM swiss cheesed air box and silconed it on.
    Than this is what I got.






    So now everything is bolted on

    Verdict:
    Well... actually give me time. I am going to add a full tank tomorrow, result will be out ~ a week.
    But performancewise I feel less torque but more power if that make sense to anyone. Not exactly sure if my mind is playing tricks on me or what not, I honestly did feel more power especially after 3000 RPM.

    However, one trade off is the induction noise. The sweet soundofav6 sounded muffed, it produced a lower pitched rumble during hard acceleration after the mod. Think of the induction noise after the mod as an idling V8 during heavy acceleration however with only the pod, the induction noise sounded lot more beastly and more aggressive but less "power".

    In essence, this experiment is attempting reveal if a heat shielded pod will give better fuel consumption than a non heat shielded pod. So subscribe to this thread. Fuel consumption result would be out in about a weeks time.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,360
    So you've basically made a way for a pod to fit inside a stock airbox, correct?

    Interesting...
    1996 Golf VR6 Colour Concept Green

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    918
    Thread Starter
    Yeah basically... it fitted flush into the box

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ermington, Sydney
    Posts
    4,421
    Yeah I thought countless times about doing this, I must say I was too scared to lose my noise

    LOUIS where is your signature gone?! haha
    Mrk Detailing, premium automotive detailing. Paint correction/protection specialist. PM me

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,360
    The noise can attract the wrong attention

    Still if flow is good and the stock airbox should hopefully act as a semi-decent heat shield. Looking forward to seeing the results of your experiment.
    1996 Golf VR6 Colour Concept Green

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,360
    Oh and clean your damn filter dude!!!!!!!
    1996 Golf VR6 Colour Concept Green

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,009
    Users Country Flag
    Looks good, I notice your missing the ghetto hoodlift mod though

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ermington, Sydney
    Posts
    4,421
    Quote Originally Posted by MattyT View Post
    The noise can attract the wrong attention
    I know..it sucks!
    Last edited by Mrk_Mickey; 24-07-2008 at 01:03 AM.
    Mrk Detailing, premium automotive detailing. Paint correction/protection specialist. PM me

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    918
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by MattyT View Post
    Oh and clean your damn filter dude!!!!!!!
    I think I will get a new one when autobarn goes on sale, I have droped tools one it a few time it's pretty battered atm. cleaning would be a waste of oil I say.

    haha ... how do I do a ghetto hood lift ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    West Sydney
    Posts
    5,858
    Users Country Flag

    Ohhh so that's why you were at Bunnings! I called you when you were there as I saw your car. I was in the area

    Just my 2 cents: the design of the airbox is partly influenced by the movement of air going towards and through the AFM in the intake pipe. Basically it'll be most efficient this way, in terms of being able to meter the correct volume of air for the combustion process. Air will be channeled so that it will travel with as little collision as possible.

    From what I know and can see, using a pod filter distorts this, but apparent change in performance/response/induction noise is due to a less restrictive system.

    What you're doing may help in reducing intake air temperature, but will be more restrictive (reduced induction noise in your case?) and might still not be any more efficient than an open pod... my thoughts anyway! I'm not exactly sure that I'm correct with what I just written down though.

    Edit: By the way, if you're still awake, I'll just let you know now that I might give you a call about after lunch tomorrow!
    Last edited by rayray086; 24-07-2008 at 12:59 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |