Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 80

Thread: Mk3 Pod/Induction Set Ups.

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,360



    Couldnt resist
    1996 Golf VR6 Colour Concept Green

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    918
    Quote Originally Posted by stotto View Post
    Sorry to post hijack, but i was in the shed and had an idea.

    could somehting like this work ?



    could you modify your stock airbox to house a pod ?. Just by eyeing it out, it looks like it could be done with only a few mods. (smaller pod would help aswell)
    I made it happen. Read my verdict.



    I am still not convinced a shielded pod makes much of a difference useless Force Induction is involved.

    Someone has said to me once "why bother with heat shield? When the car is running along, hot air is naturally pushed out anyways". I am sure this is open up for debate.

    Nevertheless, a Cold air intake does follow a logic and does have an appeal.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Newcastle NSW
    Posts
    240
    Thats exactly what I was thinking.

    awesome post, and a good read.

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    perth
    Posts
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by Water Boy View Post
    I like the pod and ram inlet pipe on this Honda



    thats (MAF) less tune suposed to be alot betta but fuel gose down the drain the idea is to have as little restrictions as possible to allow max air flow and swerll.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne VIC
    Posts
    6,786
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by mk3 gti View Post
    thats (MAF) less tune suposed to be alot betta but fuel gose down the drain the idea is to have as little restrictions as possible to allow max air flow and swerll.
    So youré saying ist good or bad?

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ermington, Sydney
    Posts
    4,421
    I think he's saying it's good, but only if you want to burn up much more fuel than normal.

    I reckon it would be pointless to do a MAFless setup unless you were working the engine. If the engine was normal and you wanted a sspiced up induction, keep your MAF and swiss cheese your airbox with a new panel filter or go for an enclosed pod/CAI.
    Mrk Detailing, premium automotive detailing. Paint correction/protection specialist. PM me

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Forest Lakes w.a
    Posts
    54
    Last edited by Mrk_Mickey; 09-08-2009 at 12:18 PM. Reason: editing IMG html :)

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,360
    Ah neat!!! another one to the CDA gang, and in WA too
    1996 Golf VR6 Colour Concept Green

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Forest Lakes w.a
    Posts
    54

    it took me a while to find one. when i looked at the price of them locally, it was pretty expensive. and my jeans with the bottomless pockets were in the wash.
    ebay uk ---> relatives in N. Ireland ---> then they posted out to me, worked out cheapest at the time.
    i had a pod setup before. an aluminium plate with heat reflector+foam stuck to the motor side helped keep the heat out to some extent but not a lot.

    CDA ftw!!!!

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Forest Lakes w.a
    Posts
    54

    and there is a distinct growl to the CDA setup that you dont seem to get with a pod or swissbox i reckon. a much more throaty or agressive noise without sounding like a vs commowhore with extractors and some piping imitating a v8 as best it can

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |