Damn!
Wouldn't want to be inside one of those if you had a smash. Never seen a car literally crumble before.
http://www.caradvice.com.au/34546/th...sh-test-video/
Clearly this is where we started... And i'm so glad at where we are today![]()
2002 Volkswagen Bora V5 - 2007 Mazda 3 GT - 1998 Ford Contour Sport - 2010 Volkswagen Jetta 2.0T - 2013 Volkswagen Passat 130TDI - 2015 Ford Escape 1.5 - 2016 Subaru WRX - 2018 Volkswagen Golf R Wolfsburg Wagon
Damn!
Wouldn't want to be inside one of those if you had a smash. Never seen a car literally crumble before.
It looked very much like some of the earlier chinese cars.
Jesus guys! Show me a car that looks much better after slamming into a solid concrete block at 100kph... I actually think older cars would fare BETTER than modern cars - not necessarily the occupants - but the cars.
Ah while yes, i'm sure VB commodores were terrible, that particular car was an example of cars being repaired poorly/welded back together.
The facts are here...
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/06/v...-leave-a-mark/
62mph which = 99.8kph
Some of the comments say that the car was a poorly repaired cut and shut weld job, had the tail shaft removed, and had 300kg ballast in the boot.
You can clearly see the effect of the ballast - the inertia in the boot area as the vehicle crashes is spectacular.
And yes, I'm glad that we've come a long way since then, although a crash at that speed in any car into a solid immovable object is likely to not end well...
Bookmarks