Page 72 of 157 FirstFirst ... 2262707172737482122 ... LastLast
Results 711 to 720 of 1569

Thread: Volkswagen under investigation over illegal software that masks pollution

  1. #711
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    264
    Users Country Flag


  2. #712
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,194
    Quote Originally Posted by frantic View Post
    Now with a fraudulent car claiming to be clean but in reality emitting more nox than a semi,
    I'm not defending VW's actions at all but I'm not comfortable with that statement. How do you arrive at that conclusion?

    Cheers

    George
    06 Jetta 2.0TFSI Killed by a Lexus!
    09 Eos 2.0TSI DSG Loved this car but has now gone to a new home!!
    14 EOS 2.0 TSI has arrived!

  3. #713
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Monaro, NSW
    Posts
    314
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by frantic View Post
    Why are people still defending a fraud?
    As to effects! Increased NOx has been linked to numerous health issues including type 1 diabetes of which 2 of my children have been diagnosed with in the last 12 months. Now with a fraudulent car claiming to be clean but in reality emitting more nox than a semi, yes there are issues that need resolving. Throw in a minimum 20% loss in trade value and either performance or economy losses with the "fix" and it's a big loss all round.
    Please stop trying to defend an admitted crime transporter and arcadelt.
    You really need to settle down my friend and read my post in the context of what I was responding to and my other posts. It's the overblown hype that I have seen in this discussion (including your completely uninformed "claiming to be clean but in reality emitting more nox than a semi" comment ) that I am railing against.
    Daily: 2010 Tiguan TDI | Candy White | Manual | 4MOTION | New York Wheels | Comfort Pack | Tinted Windows | Discover Media | MkVI MFSW | Mk7 Climatronic | RVC | Fog Lights | ECB Nudge Bar | Hella 160 Driving Lights | Rola RBXL135 Cross Bars | To Do: Colour MFD
    Toy: 2008 GTI Pirelli | Sunflower Yellow | 3 Door | DSG | Pirelli Wheels | RNS-510 | 9W7 Bluetooth | RVC | Rear Sensors | Fog Lights | To Do: Mk7 Climatronics, MkVI MFSW, Colour MFD

  4. #714
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Darwin, NT
    Posts
    157
    Users Country Flag
    I still think this is blown well out of proportion. I have polished stainless steel exhaust tips that I actually polish the inside of. Once I polish them the inside of my exhaust stays shinny and clean for at least 3 months in which I drive about 1200km per month.

    No go and stick your finger into the next diesel vehicle you find in the car park and tell me how black your finger is.

    Happy Days.

  5. #715
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Darwin, NT
    Posts
    157
    Users Country Flag
    Thanks for the link. I notice they failed to mention what fuel the bus or tuck would be using. If they were comparing a bus or truck running on petrol or LPG then of course they will produce far less NOX. What they fail to mention though is running or petrol or LPG will produce far more different pollutants that are far worse for us and the environment.

    What ever sells new I guess. Just tell half the story.

    Happy Days

  6. #716
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Darwin, NT
    Posts
    157
    Users Country Flag
    I think the critics need reminding that VW is not the only maker. I think in various stories I've seen near all the manufactures named.

    Four more carmakers join diesel emissions row | Environment | The Guardian

    I really believe the whole system is a farce. One manufacture got too close to the standard so the officials moved the goal. Then someone got close again and the officials moved the goal again. At some point someone started to cheat and passed what is not achievable. The officials moved the goal again and then they all started to cheat.

    The action that has started against VW is purely response to public opinion which is driven by the media. At some point someone will realize that VW is no worse then any of the other manufactures but by that time diesel pollution will be old news, people will be tied of reading it and as it wont sell news, it wont be reported. By that time VW will have a fight to regain which position it can in the market.

    There are plenty of holes showing in the media as I pointed out previously with comparing the VW diesel to a Truck or Bus but not including what fuel the truck or bus used. They eluded later that truck and bus drivers are happy to use adblue but didn't actually say that a VW diesel is worse than a diesel bus or truck. Another is how they keep calling it a "Cheat Device". It's not a device at all. It's just a program in the Stock Standard ECU that I have no doubt other manufactures use. The difference is the program that looks for a certain set of conditions and runs the engine differently to produce less NOX.

    Some of the possible suggested fixes include the engine using more fuel to run the exhaust hotter and burn off the NOX. If you put more in, more has to come out. Yes it might make less NOX but it's impossible for it to not make more of something else. Who knows if that something else is better or worse for us and the environment. Yes the it might then meet the standard but that doesn't mean its better.

    Happy Days

  7. #717
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    ivanhoe vic
    Posts
    950
    Just they just come clean instead of being in constant denial?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    B6 Passat Wagon No KESSY

  8. #718
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Adelaide hills, SA
    Posts
    9,708
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by frantic View Post
    https://www.toi.no/environment-and-climate/diesel-cars-have-high-emissions-in-real-traffic-article33388-1314.html
    The higlighted blue bits are LINKS!
    Diesel buses n trucks, with cars being 2-5 times worse than their allowed they are worse than the trucks, now with vw being up to 40 times euro 5/6 the maths aren't that hard?
    The question needs to be asked,
    Are they talking about the trucks emissions measured in the real driving conditions on the road or from what the truck manufacturers are stating?

    You just don't know what you don't know.
    .

  9. #719
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Monaro, NSW
    Posts
    314
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by joel0407 View Post
    I really believe the whole system is a farce. One manufacture got too close to the standard so the officials moved the goal. Then someone got close again and the officials moved the goal again. At some point someone started to cheat and passed what is not achievable. The officials moved the goal again and then they all started to cheat.
    That's a terrible characterisation of how the system works. The authorities keep raising the emissions bar, not because the manufactures are getting close (by the way, the goal is to actually beat the standards, otherwise they are not complying), but to stop the manufactures sitting on their laurel by forcing them to keep improving their emission standards.
    Daily: 2010 Tiguan TDI | Candy White | Manual | 4MOTION | New York Wheels | Comfort Pack | Tinted Windows | Discover Media | MkVI MFSW | Mk7 Climatronic | RVC | Fog Lights | ECB Nudge Bar | Hella 160 Driving Lights | Rola RBXL135 Cross Bars | To Do: Colour MFD
    Toy: 2008 GTI Pirelli | Sunflower Yellow | 3 Door | DSG | Pirelli Wheels | RNS-510 | 9W7 Bluetooth | RVC | Rear Sensors | Fog Lights | To Do: Mk7 Climatronics, MkVI MFSW, Colour MFD

  10. #720
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Darwin, NT
    Posts
    157
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Transporter View Post
    The question needs to be asked,
    Are they talking about the trucks emissions measured in the real driving conditions on the road or from what the truck manufacturers are stating?

    You just don't know what you don't know.
    .
    Yeh. Something just doesn't add up with that article. If you put more fuel in, more has to come out. It's only the form that it comes out as that they try and change. All the readings that they show have the heavy vehicles producing less. So either less fuel is being used in which case we'd all be driving around buses because they use less fuel or there are other emissions we are not being told about. I'm backing it's more the later.

    Happy Days

Page 72 of 157 FirstFirst ... 2262707172737482122 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |