Support VWWC

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 81

Thread: Volkswagen Cleared by Coroner in Melissa Ryan "Unintended Deceleration" Case

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Pacific Paradise QLD
    Posts
    7,398
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by wai View Post
    Sadly there are many who do not understand this and do many dangerous things. We tend to feel we are safe and secure in our little cocoon.

    This applies to truck drivers as well. Many simply do not realise what they are actually doing.

    Things are not made much better by the incident in the M5 (Sydney). What happened was a truck and trailer were travelling into the M5 tunnel when (for some reason) the truck started to tip its trailer. This was not an oversize truck, but something went wrong and the truck started to tip. It was this that put it over the height for the tunnel.

    But it amazes me that the authorities do not protect their assets better. For a fraction of the cost and inconvenience, suitable protection can be implemented.

    First, give a warning that a load is over height for the tunnel when the truck driver can actually do something about it and leave the motorway.

    Second provide a second level of protection that will turn on red lights requiring all vehicles to stop before entering the tunnel if an over height vehicle is still trying to go through.

    Third, implement a protective barrier that will prevent damage to the tunnel asset.

    All this can be done at much less than the cost of repair and inconvenience.

    We all need to take more care, but accidents will happen. No one sets out to do something where someone is killed or injured, or something is damaged or destroyed.
    They do have indicators and warnings and later in the day another truck was stopped trying to do a similar thing.

    How many people drive through stop signs, same thing they simply don't take any notice of signs.

    They also have introduced severe penalties for what happened EG that truck is off the road for 3 months and the driver for more probably

    What they should have is lockouts on the tipping mechanism that prevents the tray being raised above a certain speed.
    Same as on buses You cant open the doors above a very low speed which could be altered as some trucks have to move whilst tipping a load.
    It was said he reached down to pick up his glasses which he had dropped and bumped the tipping lever.

    Couldn't he see the warning light on the dash or hear the pump pushing it up.

    Carelessness mainly.
    2021 Kamiq LE 110 , Moon White, BV cameras F & B
    Mamba Ebike to replace Tiguan

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Gosford Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    4,386
    ...the number of times i've seen trucks lock brakes up because they are about to bypass the weigh station on the f3 but realise at the very last minute.

    As many of these threads eventually evolve over time into 'better driver training could have prevented this situation' - let me be the first to say it here, and get it over with.

    I am always weary of what is behind me - i had a good lesson when only 10 years old, when we were on a family holiday and were waiting at traffic lights on Pennant Hills Rd, only to be shunted by a semi into the middle on an intersection. Apart from whiplash, we were all ok, but it taught me from a young age that 1) Trucks are massive 2) Truck drivers dont always see what right infront of them (even if its a 2 tone green Kombi!) and 3) You can do a lot when in a car to position yourself out of harms way if you are alert and careful.
    '07 Touareg V6 TDI with air suspension
    '98 Mk3 Cabriolet 2.0 8V
    '99 A4 Quattro 1.8T

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    1,144
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by gldgti View Post
    ...the number of times i've seen trucks lock brakes up because they are about to bypass the weigh station on the f3 but realise at the very last minute.

    As many of these threads eventually evolve over time into 'better driver training could have prevented this situation' - let me be the first to say it here, and get it over with.

    I am always weary of what is behind me - i had a good lesson when only 10 years old, when we were on a family holiday and were waiting at traffic lights on Pennant Hills Rd, only to be shunted by a semi into the middle on an intersection. Apart from whiplash, we were all ok, but it taught me from a young age that 1) Trucks are massive 2) Truck drivers dont always see what right infront of them (even if its a 2 tone green Kombi!) and 3) You can do a lot when in a car to position yourself out of harms way if you are alert and careful.
    Exactly, and that's what defensive driving is all about. Accidents will happen, and all you can ever control is yourself. Don't think you can control others, so do things that you can to minimise the effects of any accidents.

    Yes, many trucks do drive extremely close behind vehicles, and I can assure you they CANNOT see a vehicle immediately in front of them.

    There used to be a technique taught called "tyres and tarmac". Basically, when you stop behind a vehicle at lights or in traffic, you should always be able to see the vehicle's rear tyres and some tarmac. Many will say that this is too far back, but what it does do is give you room to manoeuvre out should the need arise. If you are right up behind the vehicle in fromt, then you are a spectator if anything happens behind you.

    Back to the topic. There will be many who are disappointed with the findings, however it is what it is. From what has been reported, there is strong evidence that other factors are involved and that they provide a better explanation as to what has happened, and what has caused the tragedy. Unless people have other evidence (which should have been put forward if they did), the findings have to be accepted.
    --


  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    148
    Saddened by the loss of life in this case. Clearly the woman wasn't paying enough attention to the task - driving.
    Cannot believe however that the truck driver is not culpable. He drove into the back of her.
    If she had braked hard while the rest of the traffic was piling up around her, maybe but I just cannot understand it.
    I hope her family can find some peace in all this in time.


    Difinity

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Adelaide hills, SA
    Posts
    9,710
    Users Country Flag
    To get killed by truck from behind was hardly her fault. IMO, the truck driver is not without the guilt, imagine everyone who brakes suddenly would be run over by the truck.

    It happened on the highway, so he must have been aware that there's the car infront of him, you don't get to close to the car suddenly if you're watching the traffic infront of you 100% of the time. If anything, the higher you seat further ahead you see.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    1,144
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Difinity View Post
    Saddened by the loss of life in this case. Clearly the woman wasn't paying enough attention to the task - driving.
    Cannot believe however that the truck driver is not culpable. He drove into the back of her.
    If she had braked hard while the rest of the traffic was piling up around her, maybe but I just cannot understand it.
    I hope her family can find some peace in all this in time.
    It is human nature to try and find something else to be the cause. In this case, would a reasonable person have expected a sudden slowing down of a vehicle in front of them for no apparent reason. It would be no different to say someone deciding to ride a pushbike at speed onto a pedestrian crossing and expecting cars to simply stop.

    We are all responsible for our actions, and sometimes the price paid can be high. We all need to understand that and drive accordingly. Sadly, I doubt it will, and we will continue to have such incidents because we believe we are more capable than this (another human trait). There are still drivers who use mobile devices while driving, or who eat and drink while driving, or who drive after consuming alcohol, or who speed, or who "hoon". We are very poor learners.
    --


  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    148
    That is true, but the responsibility of the driver behind is still to try to give some room. For sure, 40 on the freeway when everybody else is at 100 will kill you, as seems to have happened here. That the truck driver can reasonably say that he didn't see her because he was too close however is studio and should be criminal. The truck should leave a greater distance so he can see. Doesn't mean he'd avoid the crash, but it may have been somewhat less severe.
    People here in Canberra tend to come up too close too - makes me very uncomfortable. After all, not only aware most of our main roads 80-100, we've got kangaroos and sleepy headed inconsiderate drivers to avoid. Someone 6" behind me at 100 doesn't feel safe at all.


    Difinity

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kilsyth, VIC
    Posts
    6,311
    Users Country Flag
    Volkswagen warned of systemic problem with Polo, Golf models, but waited 10 months to act


    Another day, another Fairfax article bashing on VW and linking back to the accident and the coroners report. Still think there isn't an agenda and they aren't using Ms Ryans death inappropriately?


    If it has an engine or heartbeat it's going to cost you. | Refer a Friend - AussieBroadband $50 Credit

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,771
    Users Country Flag
    Well, that same article also then referenced complaints by 8 owners about engine/transmission issues (no further detail) and then made the leap it was a systemic issue.

    Few would argue that VW are not the most reliable car range (and have some obvious issues they need to sort out and quick) but there is a lot of media bashing going on for sure.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Brissy
    Posts
    2,208
    Users Country Flag

    I was hit from behind by a Subaru driver about 4 years ago. 90km/h zone, he was right up m ass with high beam on. I tried to pull over but he had no room to react. He hit rather hard. My rear wheel ended up on his bonnet. Police charged him, his comprehensive insurance paid out without challenge. But when it came to the personal injury claim totally different story, 3.5 years of arguing I was blamed. They argues it was my fault for trying to stop in a 90 zone.
    I got a bigger lawyer and it settled in under 10 minutes in may favour at a face to face meeting.
    So once lawyers get involved the actual facts seem to get in the way.
    MK4 GTI - Sold
    MK5 Jetta Turbo - Sold
    MK5 Jetta 2.Slow - Until it dies.

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |