Volkswagen Australia Magazine - lack of care

**mikinoz** · 08-12-2010, 09:10 PM

Spot the careless editorial/graphic design decision on this page.

It is a shame, the majority of people that read this I am assume would be enthusiasts, but some more observant than others.

**AusScare** · 08-12-2010, 09:22 PM

Small bumper mk2 should be a mk1 pic?

**mikinoz** · 08-12-2010, 09:25 PM

Correct

1983 ain't the 70's in my book.

The Volkswagen Golf Mk2 succeeded the Mk1 as Volkswagen's volume seller from 1983 and remained in (German) production until late 1992.

**Tim** · 08-12-2010, 09:49 PM

oops!
They all look the same though right?

**madglf3** · 08-12-2010, 11:24 PM

It isn't a Mk5+ so the person who did that probably doesn't know the difference.

**team_v** · 09-12-2010, 06:56 AM

To be honest I only got into the VW scene due to the mk4 and i can appreciate the mk3 onwards but i have no knowledge of the differences between the mk1 and 2 so as Matt said, they probably had no idea and drive a mk5 or newer vw.

Having siad that it should have been checked.

**Preen59** · 09-12-2010, 10:04 AM

Originally Posted by team_v

To be honest I only got into the VW scene due to the mk4 and i can appreciate the mk3 onwards but i have no knowledge of the differences between the mk1 and 2 so as Matt said, they probably had no idea and drive a mk5 or newer vw.

Having siad that it should have been checked.

Yeah dude. If you're writing for a magazine, you really should know what you're talking about.

**team_v** · 09-12-2010, 10:07 AM

Originally Posted by Preen59

Yeah dude. If you're writing for a magazine, you really should know what you're talking about.

Definitely.
Someone should write a letter telling them that they had the wrong decade (unless they were just using the pictures as an example of the golf throughout the 30 year period.