Page 13 of 18 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 176

Thread: Toyota 86

  1. #121
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    4

    I drive at Wakefield fairly regularly so I find it usefull when Motor Magazine test cars out there as it provides a benchmark I can relate to. I really want to believe the hype (boy) regarding the 86/BZR, so I was really surprised when I read the latest Motor mag and the 86 only managed a 1:16. The cars, in order were: Scirocco R - 1:12, WRX - 1:14, Clio RS - 1:14.5, 86 GTS - 1:16, Holden SV6 - 1:16.7, MX-5 - 1:17. Interesting the three slowest cars are RWD.

  2. #122
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    19
    Users Country Flag
    Perception could be the answer to that.
    2012 - Polo 77TSI Comfortline, Sports Pack, Comfort Pack, Full window tints.

  3. #123
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Georges Hall
    Posts
    362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by schnitzel baby View Post
    I drive at Wakefield fairly regularly so I find it usefull when Motor Magazine test cars out there as it provides a benchmark I can relate to. I really want to believe the hype (boy) regarding the 86/BZR, so I was really surprised when I read the latest Motor mag and the 86 only managed a 1:16. The cars, in order were: Scirocco R - 1:12, WRX - 1:14, Clio RS - 1:14.5, 86 GTS - 1:16, Holden SV6 - 1:16.7, MX-5 - 1:17. Interesting the three slowest cars are RWD.
    Faster times have been posted by BRZ and 86 since.However,I think some people are missing the point.
    They're not supposed to be rocketships,just a great all-round drive for very reasonable money.[$30k]
    I've drive both a few times,and ordered an 86 last week.
    Great fun car without the need to achieve warp speed.
    Cheers
    Len

  4. #124
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    19
    Users Country Flag
    And they do look good!!!!!!
    2012 - Polo 77TSI Comfortline, Sports Pack, Comfort Pack, Full window tints.

  5. #125
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    4
    I think you're right and they are an okay car. I just assumed they were being touted as a more performance orientated car with great tuning potential so the lap times just surprise me a bit. Must get a drive of one one of these days.

  6. #126
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern Sydney
    Posts
    293
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by schnitzel baby View Post
    Interesting the three slowest cars are RWD.
    You could look at it that way, or you could say interesting the slowest four cars are NA in decreasing order of manic-ness...

    What are the laptimes in Dollars per second?

    Having a Gap Year!!!!
    what next?... what next?

  7. #127
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    8,708
    Users Country Flag
    Looks like people are starting to realise that the 86 isn't all it's cracked up to be.


  8. #128
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    792
    Quote Originally Posted by team_v View Post
    Looks like people are starting to realise that the 86 isn't all it's cracked up to be.

    I think people who put the 86 on the track and then moan about how slow it goes kinda misses the point of the car. Cars like the Porsche Cayman/Boxster and the 86 really come into their element when you string in a number of successive corners and see how the balance of these cars carry the cars into each corner.

  9. #129
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by MACCAA View Post
    Great fun car without the need to achieve warp speed.

    Len
    Mate's got one and give it some corners and it'll show its strength.. I remember ex gf's NA mx5 with adjustable coil-overs would leave cars twice as powerful behind through nebo/glorious/tambo. Sure as soon as the straight line came they overtook and went flying past till 2-3 corners and I needed a bullbar

  10. #130
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    67
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by schnitzel baby View Post
    I drive at Wakefield fairly regularly so I find it usefull when Motor Magazine test cars out there as it provides a benchmark I can relate to. I really want to believe the hype (boy) regarding the 86/BZR, so I was really surprised when I read the latest Motor mag and the 86 only managed a 1:16. The cars, in order were: Scirocco R - 1:12, WRX - 1:14, Clio RS - 1:14.5, 86 GTS - 1:16, Holden SV6 - 1:16.7, MX-5 - 1:17. Interesting the three slowest cars are RWD.
    Can't be trying. My MX5 ran 1.10's at Wakefield.


    2017 206 TSi R-Line

Page 13 of 18 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |