ok, ill spam them there then, lol.
:eek:
Printable View
thats the problem with a full frame camera, theyll make all but the best of lenses look like sh#t, while shooting with them.and shooting with a tamron or sigma lense probably didnt help that much with your experiances with canon.hence i dont own a single lense made by tamron or sigma,...........sure they do the job but unfortunatly when you want the best results, more often then not youve goto pay for tht privelige.
very nice pictures btw.
Liked this picture for some reason:
http://www.vwwatercooled.com.au/foru...IMG_3016-2.jpg
Actually, I'd kinda disagree with you on the full frame/lens thing. For various optical reasons I don't understand, a larger film/capture format is less demanding of it's optics. I get pretty good results with the Canon and the ****ty 28-200 considering how low end the system is. This is even more true for medium format systems.
The reason I hate the Canon is the ergonomics and functionality. It just doesn't agree with me.
Of course ;)
I just happen to think the thumb wheel is retarded, the menus counterintuitive, and the handling exceptionally clunky.
Note that I am talking about an old 35mm slr, but I feel many of these issues apply to the current canon digital range, particularly the entry level models. The 400/450d in particular has terrible ergonomics; if you used it side by side with it's competitors from nikon or pentax you'd be in for a treat. Unles you have really really tiny hands.
Something I just finised...
http://www.vwwatercooled.com.au/foru...IMG_0521-1.jpg
[IMG]http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g3...7/IMG_0524.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g3...7/IMG_0528.jpg[/IMG]
Cheers
Phil
Phil, you've got serious talent. :bowdown: