Originally Posted by
AusScare
I thought APR was better?
jk
Should be done on power/weight imo, but that would be the smart way of doing it.
APR is better (but don't tell people). Oettinger is the best though
Originally Posted by
drewr
Hm yes, but even with the GIAC tune on a MK5, it still chucks out around the same power as a MK4 R32 with a ECU remap would; however, i can see what you are suggesting, it is a lot cheaper too get bigger power through a GTi.
Never the less, i fail to see how they can justify their ruling because of 'modification' capabilities, i mean, half of the meat-heads behind the transport probably would have no idea of costings for remaps/etc for vehicles. My bet's on some guy in the office with a suit on that throws down the hammer saying that "Turbo means suppaaaapowwaaahhh=DENY!". I think over 200kw ban is reasonable for P plates, but not a ban on turbo, as there really aren't a great deal of cars that come stock turbo that actually push the 200kw barrier.
Absolutely agree. It's quite clear that people who know nothing about cars created this law with that exact mentality. IMO, they need to go through every car on Redbook and only then can they determine whether they are performance or not.
2002 Volkswagen Bora V5 - 2007 Mazda 3 GT - 1998 Ford Contour Sport - 2010 Volkswagen Jetta 2.0T - 2013 Volkswagen Passat 130TDI - 2015 Ford Escape 1.5 - 2016 Subaru WRX - 2018 Volkswagen Golf R Wolfsburg Wagon
Bookmarks