Cause regardless, the host will open a door, showing a goat. REGARDLESS. (cause he knows where they are)
IF the host RANDOMLY chose a door to open, (and picked a goat) then it would be be different.[/quote.]
You seem to be suggesting that if the host reveals a goat, the odds are different depending on whether he knew the goat was behind the door before he opened it.
![Quote](https://www.vwwatercooled.com.au/forums/images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Jarred
But since the host will also show you a goat (regardless of whether you picked a goat or the GTI on the first choice) Which leaves you with two choices. You will always get to the point where you have only two choices. First part of the game is a there only for reverse physchology. (spelling)
That's right - two choices, but each has a different probability of yielding a favourable result.
Sticking with your first guess give you a 33% chance of winning the GTI - nothing can change this. Knowing which of the two other doors hides a goat makes no difference if you decide not to switch as you already knew one of them hid a goat. Whether it is door 2 or 3 makes no difference to your odds.
Switching to the
two other doors, one of which just happens to be open, offers a probability of 67% of winning the GTI. Because they cover 67% of the field whereas your first choice covers 33% of the field.
Bookmarks