No argument that the Merc dealer is charging a higher rate for their service work than my local VW dealership does - but then again I'd expect that servicing a $170K vehicle with all sorts of electronic gizmos would require a better skilled, higher trained technician than a $30K Polo. It also reflects the increased capital requirements for servicing certain types of vehicles - things like manufacturer specific diagnostic and programming equipment.
I'm not suggesting the dealership is giving me a loan car out of a sense of charity - of course I realise it's a commercial decision where the benefits of providing the loaner service to customers outweigh the costs of maintaining the loan car fleet. In my situation it's more about the fact that I consider the availability of a free loan car to be something that comes hand-in-hand with vehicle ownership, and I'd prefer that dealers factored this service into their standard pricing rather than tacking on extra charges.
It's an economically irrational position for sure, but I would prefer to use a dealer who charged $530 for a service including a 'free' loan car rather than a dealer who charged $500 for the service then slugged me $30 for the use of the loaner.
Bookmarks