Support VWWC

View Poll Results: Which .:R tickles your fancy?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • Mk4

    46 80.70%
  • Mk5

    4 7.02%
  • Mk6

    7 12.28%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 59

Thread: Best looking .:R

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Camden, NSW
    Posts
    446
    Users Country Flag

    The Mk4 will be a classic, the others will just be golfs...
    03 MkIV GTI - K04-001, APR 2.5" TBE/TIP/Software, Forge FMIC, GFB DV+, Powergasket+, Dark Tint, 17" Bora Sport, Bilstein shocks, Eibach springs, BMC CDA, Dieselgeek SS, Hella Celis, R32 Alloy Trim...
    95 MkIII VR6 (sold)

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,508
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by golfworx View Post

    My stock VN 5L Calais can beat a stock R32 in a straight line. Probably almost out run one on a dry track too! & the VN is an older car too!
    Really? Honestly? Stock VN 5L?
    I can smack stock 5L around in the mk2.
    Ive raced a stock VS v6 against a VN 5L and they where dead even up untill 130 and it was stupid slow geting to 130.
    mk4 r32 cannot be that slow
    MK1 GLS 3door
    A4 B7 2.0T

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    374
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by golfworx View Post



    If I was buying a new current car, I would rather buy something thats got more grunt (at least 400+hp) & is local & would blow them out of the weeds in every challenge, cause I know these cars first hand from what they are like eg build quality, performance, reliability etc.
    um...I'd have to politely disagree. But in the R stakes its MK4 over and over...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    662
    Users Country Flag
    Really? Honestly? Stock VN 5L?
    I can smack stock 5L around in the mk2.
    Ive raced a stock VS v6 against a VN 5L and they where dead even up untill 130 and it was stupid slow geting to 130.
    mk4 r32 cannot be that slow
    Mk4 R32 is not that slow. Does 0-100 in 6.6 secs and has 237 Bhp.
    Stock VN 5L does 0-100 in 7.1 secs (as claimed by GMH) and has 221 Bhp.

    Everyone knows someone else with a faster car. For instance I had a lancer that would SMACK modified 350 chev utes.. Big deal
    The thread is titled Best Looking R. Mk4 Mk4 Mk4 all the way!!!
    Mk IV Golf GTI - BMP - GIAC chip, R32 wheels, KW coilovers, rear swaybar.
    Originally Posted by JoeVR
    I've never been a big fan of rotors, or really Japanese cars in general, so my choice would have to be..... an RX-8.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ermington, Sydney
    Posts
    4,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Speed View Post
    Big deal
    The thread is titled Best Looking R. Mk4 Mk4 Mk4 all the way!!!
    Can we end the thread here? Haha. Perfect words.

    Mk4 by far. Although, the mk6 is 2nd! mk5's are just not nice imo.
    Mrk Detailing, premium automotive detailing. Paint correction/protection specialist. PM me

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Spyda View Post
    Really? Honestly? Stock VN 5L?
    I can smack stock 5L around in the mk2.
    Ive raced a stock VS v6 against a VN 5L and they where dead even up untill 130 and it was stupid slow geting to 130.
    mk4 r32 cannot be that slow
    If its one thing you can count on Spyda, is I don't bulls%$t about this stuff.

    My stock VN ran 14.8@ high 90'smph on very crappy & hard Bridgestone tyres which obviously had wheel spin.

    This was before it had the VL turbo diff. gears fitted too! Not bad for a 300+K stock smelly V8

    From the figures I can find on stock R32's. its about the same!

    How far has a VW all out performance road car come since my 90 model crappy VN!

    I don't think your Mk2 would stand up to it either sorry.

    My mk1 gti modded NA 1.8L with approx 120-130hp only ran a 15.8@84?mph. I don't think an aussie spec let alone a UK spec mk2 8V would get near it either.


    I've ran remapped Mk5 gti's in the crummydore & stay with them without breaking a sweat with the A/C on & in blue "D" (overdrive)

    Polo GTI's are a whole different story though. They suck the paint of anything & everything & have some bare patches on the VN front bumper to prove the theory!
    Last edited by Oneofthegreats; 16-05-2010 at 09:02 PM.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Macquarie Park
    Posts
    449
    Users Country Flag
    mk4!!!!!!! any day!!!
    '01 VW Bora V6 4motion - gone
    17x8 TSW Hockenheims ~ TyrolSport Brake Upgrade ~ SMF + Stage 1 Clutch ~ 42DD Shifter Linkages ~ FK Coilovers

  8. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by bombsquad21 View Post
    um...I'd have to politely disagree. But in the R stakes its MK4 over and over...
    Disagree with what part of the comment?

    The part that locally built cars are faster (which they are)

    or

    About the build quality/ reliability comment?

    I work on them for a living & have probably driven more later mode - current VW's than the entire vww forum put together!

    So I only "just" have alittle bit of an idea about what they are like

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    5,745
    Not surprised to see the Mk4 is the stand out. haha.

    Quote Originally Posted by golfworx View Post
    If its one thing you can count on Spyda, is I don't bulls%$t about this stuff.

    My stock VN ran 14.8@ high 90'smph on very crappy & hard Bridgestone tyres which obviously had wheel spin.

    This was before it had the VL turbo diff. gears fitted too! Not bad for a 300+K stock smelly V8

    From the figures I can find on stock R32's. its about the same!

    How far has a VW all out performance road car come since my 90 model crappy VN!

    I don't think your Mk2 would stand up to it either sorry.

    My mk1 gti modded NA 1.8L with approx 120-130hp only ran a 15.8@84?mph. I don't think an aussie spec let alone a UK spec mk2 8V would get near it either.


    I've ran remapped Mk5 gti's in the crummydore & stay with them without breaking a sweat with the A/C on & in blue "D" (overdrive)

    Polo GTI's are a whole different story though. They suck the paint of anything & everything & have some bare patches on the VN front bumper to prove the theory!

    APR Tuned | KW Suspension | INA Engineering | Mocal Oil Control |
    Website: http://www.tprengineering.com
    Email: chris@tprengineering.com

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    332

    Quote Originally Posted by golfworx View Post
    If its one thing you can count on Spyda, is I don't bulls%$t about this stuff.

    My stock VN ran 14.8@ high 90'smph on very crappy & hard Bridgestone tyres which obviously had wheel spin.

    This was before it had the VL turbo diff. gears fitted too! Not bad for a 300+K stock smelly V8

    From the figures I can find on stock R32's. its about the same!

    How far has a VW all out performance road car come since my 90 model crappy VN!
    A quick google has a standard vn ss doing a 15.2 - 15.7 quarter and a mkIV r32 doing a 14.2-14.7.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |