Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Unsprung weight Vs. Rolling diameter.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    2,927

    Unsprung weight Vs. Rolling diameter.

    So with the up coming drags, I must choose some effective tyres.

    At my disposal I have, 15's or 17's.

    Now the problem being. The 15's with their 'more effective rolling diameter for n/a cars' need adapters, therefore weigh a fair bit. Which also adds weight to the car, but keeps it over the front axles for better traction.

    The 17's are probably half the weight of the 15's but obviously have a larger rolling diameter, 'more suited to turbocharged vehicles.'

    So, does anyone have any information on this topic. What's the better compromise, larger diameter tyres, or more Unsprung weight.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    2,214
    Users Country Flag

    Hey mate. The trick for want you're wanting to achieve is both reducing unsprung weight and reducing your overall rolling diameter and at the same time increase the width of the tyre for more traction. So a good starting place is with the original tyre size your car came with as your gearing is matched to that overall diameter. Then use this is a link to a tyre size calculator to see what tyre to run with the lighter 17" rims with the goal of minimising overall diameter or as close to stock and if possible with a wider footprint.

    Tire Size Calculator - tire & wheel plus sizing

    It's a bit of trial and error but worth it if you can find the right combo! Good luck.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |