Yeah, they're different engines but share the same narrow layout.
Not sure about the R32 but it's definitely different to the R36
2010 R36 Sedan
2007 Audi A4 B7 Cabriolet
1997 R33 GTR Skyline V-SPEC ,2011 Harley V-Rod Muscle
Yeah, they're different engines but share the same narrow layout.
R36 =
From what I've been able to find out is
The A3 3.2V6 , R32 and R36 share the VR6 Iron block 15degree format
The A4 3.2V6 is a 90 degree all alloy engine
This could explain why (to me)the R36 feels nose heavy after driving my wifes A4
2010 R36 Sedan
2007 Audi A4 B7 Cabriolet
1997 R33 GTR Skyline V-SPEC ,2011 Harley V-Rod Muscle
MY12.5 B7 V6 Passat wagon in Mocca Anthricite with Panoramic sunroof, SatNav, Driver Assistance & Visibility Package, Adaptive Cruise, Park Assist 2, Auto Tailgate,Tint, Towbar & RVC
You might be surprised. The 6 MPS got beaten by a Honda Accord Euro in the 80-120 rolling acceleration test by almost 0.3s. That's a 190kw 2.3T AWD vs 140kw 2.4NA FWD.
euro and mazda 6
I wouldn't have believed it either had I not known the poster (yfin) to be a scrupulously objective poster... Sadly the links are broken now, but that was a surprising result.
Wow!! Excuse my hesitation to accept this fact but I find that very hard to believe from a NA engine with less power that needs to rev to 7,000 rpm & then can only produce 234nm of torque. Bit suspect. If this was the case then I wonder why Honda don't produce any readily available performance figures given these amazing numbers?
Are there any offical times for the 3.6l V6 Passat 80-120kph acceleration times?
MY12.5 B7 V6 Passat wagon in Mocca Anthricite with Panoramic sunroof, SatNav, Driver Assistance & Visibility Package, Adaptive Cruise, Park Assist 2, Auto Tailgate,Tint, Towbar & RVC
Double post..
Yeah I'd like to see them prove that is a repeatable time for the Euro against an MPS ( or try again with the Mazdas handbrake off )
2010 R36 Sedan
2007 Audi A4 B7 Cabriolet
1997 R33 GTR Skyline V-SPEC ,2011 Harley V-Rod Muscle
Bookmarks