Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: RS6 Article in Drive

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    341
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter

    Quote Originally Posted by gead View Post
    i'm with kwicks on this one....i'm sure i'm going to love my r36, but if i had the coin, the rs6 would win hands down....

    let's face it if you apply the 80% use argument, there would be little need for any performance car on a daily basis...

    you can barely exploit the r36's power legally, but its nice to have it all the same....just as it would be nice to have a V10
    Agree completely. Though for the money it would be hard to not go for the E63 or M5 Wagon TBH -

    Hope this doesn't start a whole different discussion (secretly I do though).

    After seeing the two on Top Gear last year, my mate and I ended up agreeing to disagree. I liked the Benz for its features and he loved the BM.... each to their own.

    I only posted the article as I thought it would be of interest to R36 owners, bragging rights down at the local!
    Confirmed Global Warming Sceptic. No Longer a VW Owner -Loving my new 2011 Range Rover Sport - bought as VW unable to provide info on the new Toureg despite it being released overseas 12 mths ago. 2008 R36 Wagon, 2006 GTI and 2004 R32 - Gone. Sorry VW, you make great cars but until you improve your customers' experiences you will lose customers

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    187
    I'll have the RS6 thanks.

    Family wagon with a torquier Lambo Gallardo engine in it!

    Gotta love that!

    BTW, I secretly wish EVERY thread turned into a "which supercar would you have" debate!
    RIP! 2007 Passat 3.2 4Motion Black Sedan | 19"s | AVC-9000 | Audi A3 Sportback 2.0TFSIQ

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    126
    I must say after tooling around with an RS6 for the last few years thanks tot he family its a nice car to drive a bit heavy though (but damn when you put your footdown it sounds mean and throws you back in the seats). The family is upgrading to the C63 AMG Wagon in amonther month and by by RS6 so will be intresting to see how it compares.

    Compared to the R36 I must say the feel of the car and look of it is very similar to the RS6 and just as nice to drive. The R36 doesnt have the power of the Audi but its also a smaller car(feels a lot smaller) and I still think one of the best bang for your buck wagons going.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cremorne, Melbourne
    Posts
    2,218
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by reverseworm View Post
    Anyone watch it last night? Have they lost the plot or what? It is less a car show now, and more a lame attempt at comedy.

    Real shame that.
    You do realise that was the Finale and was never meant to be an episode of car reviews. It was called the 'Vietnam Special' for a reason. Notice how there was no studio time and it went for 75mins. It was a one-off.

    As for the R36 though, i know what people are talking about. The boys at Top Gear referred to it (if my memory serves me correctly) as a 'family sedan on steroids, but at the end of the day, it's still a Passat'. I think that is a little unfair really. You don't say that at the end of the day the EVO X is just a lancer, it's a completely different car.

    HOWEVER, Top Gear did a full 180 and posted a review last year that reads this:

    Take this Passat R36 as a prime example. It's a terrific car. We took it on our cross-France Rolls-Royce and Aston jaunt as support car, and we ended up liking it even more than the two V12 monsters it was shadowing. Well, 'even more' is not quite accurate, but 'liked just as much because it fulfils its intended brief so brilliantly' is a less snappy but spot-on comment. It's surprising.

    Fast, too, the big 299bhp, 3.6-litre V6 revving cleanly and quickly and bestowing this big estate with a 5.8-second 0-62mph time. Sounds throaty, and it works well with the standard DSG gearbox and four-wheel-drive system. The chassis is excellent, blending a firm but never- crashy ride with precise handling and steering. You can fling it, and it sticks.
    Just remember, they bagged it before they drove it. But after they did, look what they said. They should have done a feature on Top Gear with it (or did they).
    Last edited by RhysQ; 25-02-2009 at 01:52 PM.

    2010 Reflex Silver MK6 Golf GTI
    Sunroof - MDI - Superchip - 19" VMR V710 - Kuhmo Ecsta SPT KU31 - VW Racing Panel Filter

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    341
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by bennobee View Post
    I must say after tooling around with an RS6 for the last few years thanks tot he family its a nice car to drive a bit heavy though (but damn when you put your footdown it sounds mean and throws you back in the seats). The family is upgrading to the C63 AMG Wagon in amonther month and by by RS6 so will be intresting to see how it compares.

    Compared to the R36 I must say the feel of the car and look of it is very similar to the RS6 and just as nice to drive. The R36 doesnt have the power of the Audi but its also a smaller car(feels a lot smaller) and I still think one of the best bang for your buck wagons going.
    No offence intended, as the previous itteration of the RS6 was great, but chalk and cheese compared to the new one.

    The C63 would be great, though a bit smalll - any reason why the oldies bought the C instead of the E63?
    Confirmed Global Warming Sceptic. No Longer a VW Owner -Loving my new 2011 Range Rover Sport - bought as VW unable to provide info on the new Toureg despite it being released overseas 12 mths ago. 2008 R36 Wagon, 2006 GTI and 2004 R32 - Gone. Sorry VW, you make great cars but until you improve your customers' experiences you will lose customers

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cremorne, Melbourne
    Posts
    2,218
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by R36 Dreamer View Post
    The C63 would be great, though a bit smalll - any reason why the oldies bought the C instead of the E63?
    Aah, it's very deceptive. My boss has a new C-class and as small as they look on the outside, they are actually quite spacious inside.... i was very surprised.

    2010 Reflex Silver MK6 Golf GTI
    Sunroof - MDI - Superchip - 19" VMR V710 - Kuhmo Ecsta SPT KU31 - VW Racing Panel Filter

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    126
    Quote Originally Posted by R36 Dreamer View Post
    No offence intended, as the previous itteration of the RS6 was great, but chalk and cheese compared to the new one.

    The C63 would be great, though a bit smalll - any reason why the oldies bought the C instead of the E63?
    Very true on the new RS6 with the Lambo engine I am sure its a much improved beast but the car felt so damn big.......... therefore no offence taken

    As for the reason they got the c63... good question asked them the same question (they had been wanting to go back to a rs4) but they drove the c63 AMG sedan and it blew them away. It was not bad either bang for your buck wise. I think the E63 felt to big for them.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Melbourne Vic
    Posts
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by [-Polo GTI-] View Post
    You do realise that was the Finale and was never meant to be an episode of car reviews. It was called the 'Vietnam Special' for a reason. Notice how there was no studio time and it went for 75mins. It was a one-off.

    As for the R36 though, i know what people are talking about. The boys at Top Gear referred to it (if my memory serves me correctly) as a 'family sedan on steroids, but at the end of the day, it's still a Passat'. I think that is a little unfair really. You don't say that at the end of the day the EVO X is just a lancer, it's a completely different car.

    HOWEVER, Top Gear did a full 180 and posted a review last year that reads this:



    Just remember, they bagged it before they drove it. But after they did, look what they said. They should have done a feature on Top Gear with it (or did they).
    Yes did realise it was a onn-off episode from Vietnam, but my comment goes a bit deeper than that finale. I think I have had enough of Clarkson's constant attempt at pulling out the wittiest superlatives when all you want him to say is what he really thinks of the car. Don't get me wrong - I think it is a very entertaining program but contrast it against the earlier episodes and its poor cousin - Fifth Gear - and you get my point. I really enjoyed the commentary from professional drivers about cars that I will never hope to own in my lifetime as opposed to a contrived comedic battle of wit between the three of them. I dont know maybe I am being a bit harsh.

    Thanks for the reminder about the Top Gear commentary on the R36, and in particular, I loved the Lancer comparison!!! Couldn't agree more. I read a review today on the net that basically said that the R36 was a very capable car, and in some areas, an exceptional car but don't expect to see many on the road cause the reviewer couldn't understand why anyone would buy one. Huh? Admittedly it was a review from the UK where I think the $ differential between VW and Audi is not as significant as it is here, but just the same, if you like the car then just say so without the obligatory sting in the tail.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    2,396
    Quote Originally Posted by bennobee View Post
    The R36 doesnt have the power of the Audi but its also a smaller car(feels a lot smaller) and I still think one of the best bang for your buck wagons going.
    Just to head in the opposite direction to the supercars .......

    I liked the "bang for your buck" ratio of the Skoda Octavia vRS wagon (2.0 TFSI). Like the Audi S3, the R36 has a lot of the good gear I'd like, particularly AWD (and so it should, the R36 costs 68% more than the RS).

    Despite being able to afford it, I just wasn't prepared to spend over $50,000 on a "asset" that depreciates as quickly as a new car.

    I suppose if we all purchased cars totally with our heads rather than our hearts we'd all end up buying 2 year old ex-rental Toyotas or something, thus reducing our depreciation costs significantly.

    I'm very happy with my choice. The vRS is an excellent, roomy all-rounder, and hard to beat at its price point. I'm sure everyone here is equally happy with their choices (and if you aren't, who can you blame ? ).

    "Vive le difference"
    2017 MY18 Golf R 7.5 Wolfsburg wagon (boring white) delivered 21 Sep 2017, 2008 Octavia vRS wagon 2.0 TFSI 6M (bright yellow), 2006 T5 Transporter van 2.5 TDI 6M (gone but not forgotten).

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    ACT
    Posts
    566

    Quote Originally Posted by bennobee View Post
    I must say after tooling around with an RS6 for the last few years thanks tot he family its a nice car to drive a bit heavy though (but damn when you put your footdown it sounds mean and throws you back in the seats).
    Bennobee,

    Did you get a chance to spend any time looking at / driving the new RS6?

    I'm considering picking up an RS6 Avant and I'd be interested in your opinions about the new and/or previous model. It'll be used as a daily driver so a Benz or similar is out as that's too 'flashy' to take to client appointments, but the Audi seems pretty understated in relation to the price & performance.

    Thanks!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |