Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: R36 - Nitrogen

Hybrid View

R36Driver888 R36 - Nitrogen 26-08-2009, 01:47 PM
Swallowtail Call me a cynic, but how on... 26-08-2009, 01:54 PM
R36Driver888 I am just quoting on what i... 26-08-2009, 01:58 PM
passatpout My old man had... 26-08-2009, 02:12 PM
blutopless2 i think the main reasons for... 26-08-2009, 04:07 PM
Timbo You're noticing a placebo... 26-08-2009, 04:26 PM
Preen59 Ok now i'll have to go back... 26-08-2009, 04:46 PM
Swallowtail I'm confused... - "a hell of... 26-08-2009, 04:51 PM
Maverick You missed "I think it's a... 26-08-2009, 04:55 PM
apom Maybe it was Helium instead... 26-08-2009, 08:33 PM
Maverick A few more links Nitrogen... 26-08-2009, 08:38 PM
richdave Sorry Maverick, but while... 26-08-2009, 10:06 PM
Maverick Thanks but my head hurts... 27-08-2009, 12:23 AM
V6Passat ok....my brain just went into... 30-08-2009, 07:08 AM
G-rig One of the guys at Bob Jane... 26-08-2009, 08:54 PM
richdave Nitrogen charging of... 26-08-2009, 10:01 PM
G-rig Yeah it's like bottled (tap)... 26-08-2009, 10:06 PM
Rocket36 I won't run anything but... 26-08-2009, 10:33 PM
Treza360 For what it's worth I'm... 26-08-2009, 06:05 PM
Preen59 Read what i wrote, don't read... 26-08-2009, 04:56 PM
gregozedobe So the consensus seems to be... 26-08-2009, 06:11 PM
Swallowtail I agree with 1 to 4... :P ... 26-08-2009, 06:31 PM
Maverick RACQ have an article that is... 26-08-2009, 08:11 PM
Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,518
    I'm confused... - "a hell of a difference"... "useless in cold weather"... "never even bothered trying it in wets"... "went back to normal air"... "couldn't justify the expense"... "marginal advantage"... "quite a noticeable difference"...

    Or is it you that seems confused? LOL...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Swallowtail View Post
    I'm confused... - "a hell of a difference"... "useless in cold weather"... "never even bothered trying it in wets"... "went back to normal air"... "couldn't justify the expense"... "marginal advantage"... "quite a noticeable difference"...

    Or is it you that seems confused? LOL...
    You missed "I think it's a waste of time" and "I don't know what it will do for street tyres" and "never bothered to try it"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    382
    Maybe it was Helium instead of Nitrogen thus making the downforce on the road less and therefore reducing the drag and hence better fuel economy!

    Gone...........R36 Icelandic Gray Wagon

    Specialising in off-topic discussion

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,553
    A few more links

    Nitrogen in car tyres latest evidence that marketers believe a fool is born every minute

    Snake oil in your tyres

    Is it better to fill your tires with nitrogen instead of air?

    Fill 'er Up - - With Nitrogen

    Should I use nitrogen in my car tires?

    And I can't remember where I found this but may be of interest.

    "Putting N2 in tyres has more to do with that you can charge lots of $$$ for N2, but not for air.

    N2, being a smaller molecule, diffuses out faster. Having less weight, it also improves handling as there is less rotating mass - but not by much. If we assume a tyre has a volume of about 24 litres and is at 2.5 atmospheres pressure, then the weight of dry air in it will be 72.5 grams. (with air at 80% relative hummidity, it will be about 71 g). Fill it with N2, and it will weigh 70 grams. So you save a whopping 2.5 grams out of maybe a total tyre weight of 10 kg. Olympic cyclists fill their tyres with He to save a few grams - but then a few grams means 0.01 second which might be the difference between a medal or not.

    A gram or so of ice in the tyre may cause issues, providing you drive around corners at 300 km an hour within a few seconds of starting the car and before it has melted and evaporated.

    As the tyre warms up, the air or nitrogen will expand. If the tyre is at 20 C and then warms up to 40 C, then the air or nitrogen will expand by 1-((273+(40-20))/273) = 0.07 or 7%. If the tyre is at 35 psi at 20 C, it will increase to 37.5 psi at 40 C. Filling with different gases will make no difference as they all expand the same amount if raised by the same amount. If anything, using a denser gas such as S8F will take longer to heat up due to the higher specific heat (amount of heat required) to take it from 20 to 40 C (or whatever) but then will stay warmer longer."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Outer East - Melbourne
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by Maverick View Post
    N2, being a smaller molecule, diffuses out faster. Having less weight....
    Sorry Maverick, but while Nitrogen has a lower molecular weight, 28 Vs O2 with 32, the molecule size is actually larger thus it does not permeate thru the rubber walls as fast as O2.

    And the science behind it...Link
    MY12 Volvo V60 T5 Tekink in Ice White
    MY08 125Kw TDI DSG Wagon in Mocca (02/08 - 03/12)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,553
    Quote Originally Posted by richdave View Post
    Sorry Maverick, but while Nitrogen has a lower molecular weight, 28 Vs O2 with 32, the molecule size is actually larger thus it does not permeate thru the rubber walls as fast as O2.

    And the science behind it...Link
    Thanks but my head hurts after reading that!

    Here's part of the document for those interested

    Are Nitrogen Molecules Really Larger Than Oxygen Molecules?
    The correct answer, with respect to “permeation”, is yes.
    Graham’s Law Explained:
    The Difference between Effusion and Permeation
    There's often confusion associated with the molecular size, molecular weight and permeation properties of
    oxygen and nitrogen molecules, and GNI is often called to task to explain why nitrogen actually migrates
    (permeates) out through the rubber of a tire slower than does oxygen. We felt it best to leave it to the expertise
    of Dr. Keith Murphy to elaborate on the scientific principles:
    "Effusion" calculations are not appropriate for "permeation" of gas molecules through materials, such as the rubber of
    tire walls. There is a fundamental difference in transport occurring through “effusion”, and transport occurring through
    “permeation”.
    Effusion would be appropriate, if the O2 and N2 molecules were passing through a relatively large passage way
    through the tire wall, such as a leak. Graham's Law for "effusion" applies ONLY if the exit through which the molecules
    pass is relatively large compared to the size of the molecules and does NOT obstruct or constrain one molecule from
    passing through relative to the other molecule. O2 and N2 molecules are only slightly different in molecular size but
    both are very small. Thus, to constrain one molecule's (e.g., molecule of type A) passage relative to the other's (e.g.,
    molecule of type B) passage, that passage way size must be fairly close in dimension to the sizes of the molecules
    themselves.
    Graham's Law does not apply, if the passage way is very small, as occurs for dimensions of passage ways in-between
    the polymer chains in a solid rubber, where the dimensions between the polymer chains do indeed constrain passage
    of the larger size molecule, which is actually N2, compared to less constraint on the smaller size molecule, which is
    actually O2.
    It is often mistakenly assumed that "molecular size" correlates directly with "molecular weight". O2 does have a greater
    molecular weight (32) than N2 (2, but O2 is actually smaller in size. Thus, O2 fits through the relatively tight passage
    ways between polymer chains in the rubber more easily than does N2. The difference is size between O2 and N2 is
    very small, only about 0.3 times 10 to the -10th meters (0.00000000003 meters).
    ....................

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    242
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by richdave View Post
    Sorry Maverick, but while Nitrogen has a lower molecular weight, 28 Vs O2 with 32, the molecule size is actually larger thus it does not permeate thru the rubber walls as fast as O2.

    And the science behind it...Link
    ok....my brain just went into melt dowm!!
    V6Passat
    Here now!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,618
    One of the guys at Bob Jane today were mentioning Nitrogen when I went in for a rotate & alignment, and it didnt take me long to say 'Normal air is fine' and they didn't even mention the price.

    They claimed you don't need to check your tyres for 6 months, but it's pretty easy to see it's just a money making idea.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Outer East - Melbourne
    Posts
    372
    Nitrogen charging of tyres....


    God's way of saying you have money to burn
    MY12 Volvo V60 T5 Tekink in Ice White
    MY08 125Kw TDI DSG Wagon in Mocca (02/08 - 03/12)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,618
    Yeah it's like bottled (tap) water & san pellegrino.
    Last edited by G-rig; 26-08-2009 at 10:13 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |