Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: R36 Dtw Tune??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    50

    R36 Dtw Tune??

    HI GUYS...
    Im lookin at en ECU tune..
    Checking out DTWs tune looks impressive but when I saw graph, I was a bit surprised..IS IT TRUE THAT STOCK WE ONLY HAVE 132KW at wheels???
    2009 R36 Black Sedan.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne CBD
    Posts
    96
    The melbourne 36's are 140ish Kw atw from factory.. But then again.. The temperature when its being dynoed also varies the power reading.. so yea, its not that far off...
    ALFIE

    Nissan Elgrand E50, Polo GTI and Evo 6RS Track car

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lewiston South Austrlia
    Posts
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by SharifE View Post
    HI GUYS...
    Im lookin at en ECU tune..
    Checking out DTWs tune looks impressive but when I saw graph, I was a bit surprised..IS IT TRUE THAT STOCK WE ONLY HAVE 132KW at wheels???
    SharifE, I think you mean DWT. Those results were from my car and in original 'tune' it only delivered 132KW ATW. Alfie is correct to say the results vary a great deal due to atmospheric conditions. I also hastened to add I have yet to see any other dyno results of a 'standard' Oz R36. pj

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    365
    Quote Originally Posted by SharifE View Post
    HI GUYS...
    Im lookin at en ECU tune..
    Checking out DTWs tune looks impressive but when I saw graph, I was a bit surprised..IS IT TRUE THAT STOCK WE ONLY HAVE 132KW at wheels???
    That's probably about right. Most transmissions are about 85% efficient at best, and there's 2 of them between the flywheel and the wheels (gearbox and diff). That doesn't take into account other losses along the way, eg friction with bearings (small, but still there).

    220*0.85 = 187kW, 187*.85 = 159kW.

    Take into account hotel load (ie power used that isn't for propulsion), so things like AC, power steering, electrics, and variations with temperature, fuel quality, build quality (there'll be an allowable tolerance on power output from the factory, assuming they're testing under the same conditions, probably +/- 10%).. could quite easily be 132kW at the wheels.

    Just remember, though, that the thermal efficiency of an engine means that around 2/3 of the energy in the fuel is lost before it's even hit the flywheel, roughly a third through the radiator and a third through the exhaust.

    Cheers...
    MY08 Passat 2.0 TDI Wagon
    Trialling golf ball aerodynamics theory - random pattern, administered about 1550 on Christmas Day, 2011.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Southside...
    Posts
    2,514
    Users Country Flag
    The Haldex AWD system has a fair chunk of drivetrain loss from the flywheel. Not sure what it is for you guys with the latest Haldex generation but the one in my car was around 30%. The Gen2 might be a little better but I wouldn't imagine it would be too much.

    To put this in comparison, the last stock WRX I saw dynoed with its' full mechanical AWD lost around 25%.

    From what I've seen and read FWD is around a 15% loss, RWD is about 20-25% and AWD is around 25-30%.

    Cheers,
    Trent

    2010 Renault Clio RenaultSPORT 200 Cup 20th Anniversary Edition - #19 of 30 - The French Connection...
    2004 Volkswagen Golf R32 MkIV - #044 of 200 - Gone But Not Forgotten...
    "Racing is life; Anything that happens before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen -=-=- "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Unknown

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    94
    130-odd KW does not look much, but who cares if they goes like a shower of ****!
    numbers do not always mean everything.

    consider stock rex run 125-145KWatw, and our R36 are much quicker.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    50
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by pj's View Post
    SharifE, I think you mean DWT. Those results were from my car and in original 'tune' it only delivered 132KW ATW. Alfie is correct to say the results vary a great deal due to atmospheric conditions. I also hastened to add I have yet to see any other dyno results of a 'standard' Oz R36. pj
    Hi Alfie, are u happy with ur tune??Any issues??
    2009 R36 Black Sedan.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne CBD
    Posts
    96
    I am very happy with my tune mate.. No problems with it... Done 15,000km's since the tune and the car is running smoother than factory.
    Check the tune out: www.evolve-technik.com.au
    ALFIE

    Nissan Elgrand E50, Polo GTI and Evo 6RS Track car

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    560
    Quote Originally Posted by Black R36 Sedan 09(alfie) View Post
    I am very happy with my tune mate.. No problems with it... Done 15,000km's since the tune and the car is running smoother than factory.
    Check the tune out: www.evolve-technik.com.au
    How much was the ECU upgrade?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Melbourne CBD
    Posts
    96

    I can't remember mate..
    Drop them (Evolve) a line and ask..
    ALFIE

    Nissan Elgrand E50, Polo GTI and Evo 6RS Track car

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |