negative gearing is just a fancy name for overall investment. if a business is making money it pays tax, if one division is making money and yet another is losing money, it consolidates its revenue, and pays tax on the net income.
if an individaul has a job - he/she pays tax. however if he/she has other investments which are making a loss, then he/she can consolidate revenue and pay the net tax.
this is the principle of negative gearing, it allows indivuals to consolidate revenues and losses.
Of course, the investor will pay a very large amount of tax when the investment ripens (in theory) in due course - so its not a subsidy,its recognising short term losses vs longer term capital gains.
what you are suggesting is that nobody should be able to claim losses? you pay tax on the gains, but wear all the losses? this is hardly a balanced argument.
MY08 Passat Sedan
Metallic Silver
125KW TDI, Sat/Nav
Vic Govt actually cut stamp duty just over a year ago. Saved me about $600 on the Passat, changed the day before I took delivery.
B6 Passat Wagon No KESSY
Yes absolutely true and I was aware of that. I was making a point in regards to the statements that were made regarding negative gearing which of course are off topic.
The point I was making was that whilst property investors do receive a tax deduction for their expenses they also make contributions in other ways. If negative gearing was eliminated and property investors bailed out, those taxes would not be collected and both State & Federal governments would then find someone else to slug.
Cheers
George
06 Jetta 2.0TFSI Killed by a Lexus!
09 Eos 2.0TSI DSG Loved this car but has now gone to a new home!!
14 EOS 2.0 TSI has arrived!
Bookmarks