Page 10 of 84 FirstFirst ... 891011122060 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 833

Thread: Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Semaphore, SA
    Posts
    8,708
    Thread Starter

    Quote Originally Posted by Melbourne_Tiggy View Post
    Well done! Now you have a baseline before you install your hybrid IS38 and get a custom tune.
    Yes still have to decide which route to head in terms of hardware and tuning.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

    2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
    2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
    2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold)
    - Tigger73's 125TSI Build



  2. #92
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Semaphore, SA
    Posts
    8,708
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Melbourne_Tiggy View Post
    Tigger am I reading that correctly......461nm atw?????
    That’s 461Nm at the roller. This is uncorrected torque measured by the dyno. Some people will then try and calculate a torque figure but it’s pretty difficult as it will depend on tyre size and a bunch of other driveline parameters.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

    2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
    2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
    2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold)
    - Tigger73's 125TSI Build



  3. #93
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by tigger73 View Post
    That’s 461Nm at the roller. This is uncorrected torque measured by the dyno. Some people will then try and calculate a torque figure but it’s pretty difficult as it will depend on tyre size and a bunch of other driveline parameters.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    That doesn't make any sense, if the calculation for torque isn't accurate or can't be taken as true at the wheel figure, then neither can the kW figure as the two are directly linked, kW is a function of Torque.

    So either they're both accurate or neither is.

    WEN Technology - Calculators
    Power-Torque - WEN Technology


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Semaphore, SA
    Posts
    8,708
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by rscott4563 View Post
    That doesn't make any sense, if the calculation for torque isn't accurate or can't be taken as true at the wheel figure, then neither can the kW figure as the two are directly linked, kW is a function of Torque.

    So either they're both accurate or neither is.

    WEN Technology - Calculators
    Power-Torque - WEN Technology


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Power figures are kwaw which are a calculated value.

    Torque figures on the dyno sheet are the actual/measured torque on the dyno roller.

    I'm not sure of the actual calculation/conversion that is used for the kwaw power figures, but the dyno guys do it all day every day so I'll take their word for it.

    There's always discussion about torque. Some dyno operators will print out torque curves and give you a calculated engine torque (so you can try and compare it to manufacturer figures), however there's a lot of errors/assumptions when you do this (like exactly how squashed were the tyres on the roller and how worn are your tyres) so it's really hard to calculate the engine torque accurately which is why this dyno operator just gives the measured dyno torque value (which is true/correct).

    2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

    2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
    2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
    2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold)
    - Tigger73's 125TSI Build



  5. #95
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by tigger73 View Post
    Power figures are kwaw which are a calculated value.

    Torque figures on the dyno sheet are the actual/measured torque on the dyno roller.

    I'm not sure of the actual calculation/conversion that is used for the kwaw power figures, but the dyno guys do it all day every day so I'll take their word for it.

    There's always discussion about torque. Some dyno operators will print out torque curves and give you a calculated engine torque (so you can try and compare it to manufacturer figures), however there's a lot of errors/assumptions when you do this (like exactly how squashed were the tyres on the roller and how worn are your tyres) so it's really hard to calculate the engine torque accurately which is why this dyno operator just gives the measured dyno torque value (which is true/correct).
    Refer to my previous link, physics don't lie.

    kW (or HP) and Nm (or lbft) are directly linked, power is a result of rpm and torque.

    Not saying there is anything wrong with the figures you have on your dyno report. Just saying that if you are saying that the torque figure is not accurate then unfortunately neither is your power figure. But also vice versa. Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Semaphore, SA
    Posts
    8,708
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by rscott4563 View Post
    Refer to my previous link, physics don't lie.

    kW (or HP) and Nm (or lbft) are directly linked, power is a result of rpm and torque.

    Not saying there is anything wrong with the figures you have on your dyno report. Just saying that if you are saying that the torque figure is not accurate then unfortunately neither is your power figure. But also vice versa. Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline
    Understand what you're saying. I'm not too fussed about the torque figure to be honest. You change your tyres (or what gear you're running in) and you'll end up with a different figure.

    I'm not trying to relate it back to manufacturer figures (which some people try to) so I'm not really worried.

    What is most important is that I run back on the same dyno with simliar conditions and I can then compare stock vs stage 1 vs stage 2

    2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

    2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
    2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
    2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold)
    - Tigger73's 125TSI Build



  7. #97
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    38
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by tigger73 View Post
    You change your tyres (or what gear you're running in) and you'll end up with a different figure.
    Just remember that this "different figure" will be both the torque and kW figures.

    Quote Originally Posted by tigger73 View Post
    What is most important is that I run back on the same dyno with simliar conditions and I can then compare stock vs stage 1 vs stage 2
    Agreed, that's the key. Actual figures reported on a dyno (especially peak figures) are pretty pointless due to the shear number of variables between dyno types, testing methods, external factors, etc. It's all about the delta and keeping all testing conditions as identical as possible.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Helensburgh
    Posts
    1,336
    You can forget even doing reliable back to back comparisons unless they are done on the same day on a chassis dyno, too many variables and even the operator can influence what the outcome is. Chassis dynos are good for doing stuff like mapping or fault finding which they do well but getting reliable & repeatable figures out of one is like drawing numbers out of a hat. It takes a lot of dedicated training to get good numbers out of an engine dyno and that has a lot less influence from outside factors.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Semaphore, SA
    Posts
    8,708
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozsko View Post
    You can forget even doing reliable back to back comparisons unless they are done on the same day on a chassis dyno, too many variables and even the operator can influence what the outcome is. Chassis dynos are good for doing stuff like mapping or fault finding which they do well but getting reliable & repeatable figures out of one is like drawing numbers out of a hat. It takes a lot of dedicated training to get good numbers out of an engine dyno and that has a lot less influence from outside factors.
    Although I agree with what you're saying, there's not really too many other options that are 1) affordable 2) give reasonable results.

    The dyno I use is one of the highest use Mainline dynos in the country. I'm well aware that there's a number of factors that can have a big influence on the result (tyre pressures, ambient temps, heat soak in warming up, strapping tension, ramp rate, etc, etc). I'm well aware it's not perfect, however if you get a good operator you can achieve some reasonably repeatable results.

    I'll also be doing some time 0-100 runs in the not too distant future and the combination of the 2 will give a reasonable indication of the performance of the car. Who knows I may even put it down the 1/4 mile, however I'm not really chasing numbers. It's a daily driver and it has to do that job well (my mods are geared around making it the most enjoyable daily driver) and the other stuff is really a bonus.

    2017 Tiguan Sportline - Tigger73's 162TSI Sportline

    2016 Scirocco R, stage 1, 205kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's Scirocco R Build
    2013 Tiguan 155TSI, stage 1, 144kwaw (sold) - Tigger73's 155TSI Build
    2011 Tiguan 125TSI, Stage 2+, 152kwaw (sold)
    - Tigger73's 125TSI Build



  10. #100
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    455
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by tigger73 View Post
    Although I agree with what you're saying, there's not really too many other options that are 1) affordable 2) give reasonable results.

    The dyno I use is one of the highest use Mainline dynos in the country. I'm well aware that there's a number of factors that can have a big influence on the result (tyre pressures, ambient temps, heat soak in warming up, strapping tension, ramp rate, etc, etc). I'm well aware it's not perfect, however if you get a good operator you can achieve some reasonably repeatable results.

    I'll also be doing some time 0-100 runs in the not too distant future and the combination of the 2 will give a reasonable indication of the performance of the car. Who knows I may even put it down the 1/4 mile, however I'm not really chasing numbers. It's a daily driver and it has to do that job well (my mods are geared around making it the most enjoyable daily driver) and the other stuff is really a bonus.
    Hi Tigger, I highly recommend using a Draggy device for measuring your performance stats. As part of its data capture it validates the angle of the terrain (%incline/decline) and if it’s within a certain threshold you can post it and compare your performance to cars in Au and around the world. In terms of accuracy, it has been demonstrated to be similar to Vbox. A great little device for under $200.

    All the best with your performance journey. I’m looking forward to reading about your selections and stats!

    Cheers

Page 10 of 84 FirstFirst ... 891011122060 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |