Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: dont shoot! would you consider an XC40?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    109
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Delewin View Post
    From what I understand the xc60 fitted out is significantly more expensive than the 162 TSI R line

    Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
    That's correct. Tiguan is definitely better value.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Docklands, VIC
    Posts
    7
    I would of thought the XC40 was the right comparison with the Tiguan.

    dont shoot! would you consider an XC40?-volkswagen-tiguan-2016-jpgdont shoot! would you consider an XC40?-volvo-xc40-2018-jpg

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Artarmon, NSW
    Posts
    318
    Users Country Flag
    Physical dimensions is not the main criteria. I look at the total package including the "smart" technology, cost of servicing, depreciation, etc.

    Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
    Ordered: 2017 build date Tiguan 162 TSI Highline with DAP in Tungsten Silver and rear luggage tray. ETA: late April / Early May. I did not have to wait. I took delivery on 11 March 2017.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    207
    Users Country Flag
    Interesting that the dimensions are similar. Having tested them both the XC40 felt smaller.

    New Volvo XC40 vs BMW X1 vs Volkswagen Tiguan - What Car?

    If you are in the market for these cars look at what you don't get rather than what you do. You will find the XC40 is full of compromises.
    Arteon & T-Roc

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    109
    Users Country Flag
    I think Xc40 is smaller windows, smaller interior space, smaller bootspace and smaller engine.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    109
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Pzero View Post
    I think Xc40 is smaller windows, smaller interior space, smaller bootspace and smaller engine.
    Correction, looks like
    Xc40 top spec engine may be faster.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    635
    Users Country Flag
    Having read the Wheels short review of the launch pack XC40, it sounds a good thing but it seem that the Q2 is more of natural rival for it.
    Indium Grey Golf 7.5 Alltrack 135tdi Premium - all options

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    137
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by HiddenTaco View Post
    Interesting that the dimensions are similar. Having tested them both the XC40 felt smaller.

    You will find the XC40 is full of compromises.
    im yet to see the XC40 in person but from reviews suggestion is interior passenger room is decent, maybe even bigger than the tig (it is wider..?)

    what compromises did you find? i got the impression the tech for each lined up but not sure if ive missed anything

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    137
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Pzero View Post
    Correction, looks like
    Xc40 top spec engine may be faster.
    higher output but heavier car so on par performance wise

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    207
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by daz32 View Post
    im yet to see the XC40 in person but from reviews suggestion is interior passenger room is decent, maybe even bigger than the tig (it is wider..?)

    what compromises did you find? i got the impression the tech for each lined up but not sure if ive missed anything
    Sorry, I should have clarified.. When I was in the market the benchmark I set was the XC60 rdesign Petrol which was on offer without negotiating for 85k. Then the XC40 came out and I looked at that in rdesign Petrol vs the XC60 and felt that although $20k+ cheaper it was no where near the league of the 60. I was hoping for a smaller version of the XC60.

    The interior, the drive, the tech just felt budget vs the XC60.

    I couldn't justify the XC60 price and because that was the benchmark the XC40 had no hope. Then I started considering VW Tig Rline which although doesn't have the interior quality of Volvo seemed way more bang for buck and more "fun".
    Arteon & T-Roc

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |