Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: 2018 Tig Highline 162 Vs Peugeot 3008 GT Line

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wamberal, NSW
    Posts
    42
    Users Country Flag

    2018 Tig Highline 162 Vs Peugeot 3008 GT Line

    Hi all, after a long time away (sold a Tiguan some years back), looking to come back to the Tiguan family, but torn between a 162 Highline and the Peugeot 3008 GT Line (Petrol). I know this is a VW centric forum but love to hear of owners experience with the 162, especially real world fuel economy.

    At this point my comparison goes like this

    Looks...........3008
    Engine ........Tiguan
    Space..........Equal
    Finish..........small win to 3008
    Cost (value)....3008
    Warranty.........3008
    Performance ....Tiguan

    So its not an easy decision, I have ruled out Diesel having had an almost DPF wallet lightening experience with a LR Evoque.
    MY19 162 Highline R-Line, SVP, Pano roof, Pure White

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    48
    Users Country Flag
    We also had hard mental battle as well moving away from a 2016 petrol LR discovery sport but with the amount of headaches and time the car spent in dealership we have managed to get comfortable with this 110 TSI (9sec to 100kmh), similar power to the petrol Disco sport (8 sec to 100kmh) with much better fuel economy. The 6-sp DSG is 10times more smoother than the 9 speed ZF in the LR. We were lookink at a diesel TD4 but then found out the DPF saga was huge that we gave up our deposit for it.

    Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wamberal, NSW
    Posts
    42
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Pointcookie, I had that 9 speed in the LR Evoque it got into a tangle around 4-5-6, the diesel had a mountain of power.
    MY19 162 Highline R-Line, SVP, Pano roof, Pure White

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Yeerongpilly, Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    391
    Users Country Flag
    The Mrs chose a 3008 over a Mazda CX5/Tiguan, she's had it for 12 months now and couldn't be happier. She just wanted something a bit different. The 1.6 litre turbo in the Peugeot certainly has more poke than the lethargic 2.0 in the CX5. She didn't get to test drive the Tiguan, she picked the 3008 before that opportunity came up. No rattles or faults with the 3008 and the fit and finish is very good.
    BMW Z4 (2019)
    Audi TT quattro (2015), s-line in Nano Grey - sold

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    48
    Users Country Flag
    Also check the euro encap website to see if the interurban AEB score is good or not, you want 2.5 or more for good pretection. I think this Tiguan has 2.8. The highest is the new XC60 scoring 3. Our old disco sport scores 2.5 and it saved our lives

    Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
    Last edited by Pointcookie; 21-08-2018 at 05:08 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by coastvw View Post
    Hi all, after a long time away (sold a Tiguan some years back), looking to come back to the Tiguan family, but torn between a 162 Highline and the Peugeot 3008 GT Line (Petrol). I know this is a VW centric forum but love to hear of owners experience with the 162, especially real world fuel economy.

    At this point my comparison goes like this

    Looks...........3008
    Engine ........Tiguan
    Space..........Equal
    Finish..........small win to 3008
    Cost (value)....3008
    Warranty.........3008
    Performance ....Tiguan

    So its not an easy decision, I have ruled out Diesel having had an almost DPF wallet lightening experience with a LR Evoque.
    I extensively drove the 3008 before ordering the tiguan wolfsburg (not delivered yet). If you dont place much importance on occasionally being able to floor it and flick up and down the gears, then the 3008 is the better choice. I almost went with the Allure model in the 3008 range which would have been $45K compared to $60k for the tiguan. However, i figured out that would need the GT Line with leather which was $55k. At that price the decision to spend another $5k for the tiguan was easy. The 3008 is a really nice car, something different and great looker regardless of spec. If only it had a slightly sportier engine I would have gone for it

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    701
    Users Country Flag
    Doesn't the 3008 have a CVT?
    Tiguan Gen2 162TSI Etuners IS38 Stage 3 238.6 kw@4 wheels

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    SE Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    319
    Quote Originally Posted by INASNT View Post
    Doesn't the 3008 have a CVT?
    That's a no for me, we're trading in a Pathfinder for the Allspace that has one of those abominations in them... never again will I purchase a car with a CVT, horrible to drive, just like a big rubber band when you put the foot down.....
    MY17 Tiguan 162 Highline | DAP | Rline | Pano Sunroof | Pure White
    Stage 2.5 - APR DP, APR Turbo inlet, Muffler delete, IS38 Turbo, APR tune

    MY18 Tiguan 162 Highline AllSpace | Sound & Vision | Sunroof | Blue Silk

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Victoria
    Posts
    701
    Users Country Flag
    Has a new Corolla as hire car recently with CVT... Pile of poo to drive.
    Tiguan Gen2 162TSI Etuners IS38 Stage 3 238.6 kw@4 wheels

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Location
    Canberra, ACT
    Posts
    51
    Users Country Flag


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |