Maverick, I know that you've been happy with Merrick's work putting Ventureshield Stonegard on your car in the past. You and other people have stated this on the forums, and whether Merrick knows this or not, I have also referred people to his business when they've asked where to get PPF in QLD.
However, PPF and the quality and professionalism of the installation isn't the topic being discussed.
Since you haven't been in contact with Merrick for 18 months, have you looked at his new product range of "Ceramic Polymer Nanotechnology" paint care? If you haven't, please go and look at the website. Once you have, or if you already have, can you please explain to me how Merrick's website is any different to any of these other "marketting BS" examples that you are pointing out?
This is what I object to in all these posts, and I feel that this is what other members are objecting to here as well. Merrick is coming to a forum and giving his opinion of other peoples products, but what is it based on? Any hands on experience with those products? Any scientific studies he's conducted on those products? Or just reading their websites/forums etc?
Merrick appears to be telling people that competitors to his products cannot possibly do what they claim, and that people should look around the web and find his products instead. Yet, in my opinion from reading his site, his products make pretty much the same claims that he is claiming other companies can't meet. So why can his?
Yes, I'm not a scientist, and I haven't done any hands on comparison of all these products in a lab or controlled environment. But if Merrick isn't a scientist or hasn't conducted these tests either, how are his words any more valid than anyone elses here?
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Corey_R
Bookmarks