Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: Upgrading 90Tsi

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld
    Posts
    136
    Thread Starter

    Sold the 90 Tsi, with the ECU chip.

    It was an amazing car. Great fuel economy.

    Upgraded to a 2.0T Quattro A3.

    I really think it wasn't much of an upgrade.

    Always remember that power to weight ratio is a huge indicator in your cars performance! (1250 vs 1550 Kg)... ( I didn't realise the quattro was so f---en heavy)

    The 90TSI with a chip is probably the best car I have ever driven. Fuel economy, performance, just generally ample amounts of fun!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    6,069
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by khonfahm View Post
    Okay,

    So I have purchased the Bluefin superchips unit.

    Had a lot of issues and hiccups with installing it...

    Final product is GREAT. But if you are not computer savvy, rather GO APR!
    Reason you had issues with the Bluefin was because of the 6 hour APR trial you had installed. It leaves behind the APR version of your stock file, not your ACTUAL stock file.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buller_Scott View Post
    guys, for those who are thinking of a tune for their car, can i just point out that there are more than 2 tuners in australia:

    apr
    giac (seem to kill everyone at melbourne dyno days)
    custom code
    superchips / bluefin
    dna (ridiculously smooth dyno plots)
    revo technik
    evolve technik
    viezu / chippeduk
    etc etc.

    take your time, do your research on here and other forums, and good luck!
    I just had my Golf R tuned with a DNA Tune a few weeks ago (previously had a Bluefin). The DNA tune is alot stronger than the Bluefin, especially above 4,000rpm.

    Quote Originally Posted by SMOK3Y View Post
    hey Buller ya im going for DNA once i can. im presuming smooth dyno plots is a good thing?
    Excellent value for money and good service.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buller_Scott View Post
    you bet, mate.

    smooth dyno plots = smooth delivery of power, which in turn = smooth driveability. im not too clued up on just how it all works, but one could presume that an inconsistent (flat, then spikey) dyno curve would mean flat spots, followed by unpredictable shoves in the back, in the real world.

    a smooth curve means smooth driveability, which is much more of an asset for a car to have when you're actually driving it on the street, and not simply shooting for the stars in terms of kw bragging rights.

    either way, if you're going for dna, you will not be disappointed - VERY very nice dyno curves (and no, they dont pay me to share what i've seen of their dyno graphs in the past)
    Will be getting my car dyno'd in a few weeks, so will hopefully have another good result for DNA.
    2017 Ford Fiesta ST the go kart

    2015 Audi SQ5 bi-turbo V6 TDI family hauler

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld
    Posts
    136
    Thread Starter
    I did have issues with the APR trial on the car.. but I had more difficulty setting up the bluefin on windows 7 on my computer. In the end, had to go out and buy a portable dvd rom for my netbook, and cause it was running windows xp, it installed easily.

    I'm sure they have adjusted the windows 7 capability by now.. but back then, I had a lot of issues installing the bluefin unit software into my computer.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    3,178
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by khonfahm View Post
    ( I didn't realise the quattro was so f---en heavy)
    The AWD also adds a fair bit of extra rotational inertia to the drivetrain as well as just overall weight
    Resident grumpy old fart
    VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Brisbane, Qld
    Posts
    136
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by kaanage View Post
    The AWD also adds a fair bit of extra rotational inertia to the drivetrain as well as just overall weight
    Higher rotational inertia means more body roll?

    I think in classical dynamics; it is a measure of an object's resistance to rotation.

    So the heavier car, should have less body roll (theoretically, obviously a lot more to consider).

    I found that the 90TSI, had a lot less body roll than my Quattro 2.0T. So it goes against theory. Thoughts on this?
    Last edited by khonfahm; 31-05-2012 at 02:20 PM.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    3,178
    Users Country Flag
    Nah, it slows acceleration which is why AWD cars don't get great figures on inertial dynos compared to 2WD cars with similar engines (the drive train is the path from the engine to the tyre contact patch)
    Resident grumpy old fart
    VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    6,069
    Users Country Flag

    Just found this in depth info on the 90TSI engine if anyone is interested > http://tbr.gr/122hp/SSP_405_1.4l_90k...rbocharger.pdf
    2017 Ford Fiesta ST the go kart

    2015 Audi SQ5 bi-turbo V6 TDI family hauler

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |