Support VWWC

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53

Thread: Throttle Bodies

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,059
    Users Country Flag

    I can reel off pages of crap about this, but there's no point. It really comes down to whether or not you have the funds to build a race motor with the volumetric efficiency to use (... or need) the extra intake potenial.

    When you get the motor to this point, it's so peaky that you also need to address the gearbox, which isn't just a matter of changing the ring and pinion, as this slaughters any notion of top speed, it means swapping in a whole new gearset.

    It goes from a $5000 exercise for a nice sound to a $30,000 exercise for a well-performing engine and driveline.

    I hate turbo cars, but I've built one, as VW engines don't perform well without a turbo, and I like VWs...

    1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Devonport, Tasmania
    Posts
    692
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    mmm maybe theyre not the go. I just thought they would of been a good alternative to the twin side draught webbers.

    ah well I have time to ponder these things. Thanks for the input guys. I appreciate it.

    I mean I was thinking of having an engine with power at around 170hp - 200hp???
    2000 SAAB 9-5 Aero - Stage 2. 275hp 420Nm, Brew City Boost
    1986 SAAB 900 Turbo 16 S

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,059
    Users Country Flag
    Having been there and done that, I'd spend my money on high class headwork and cams and a good value ECU, like an Autronic SMC. You can make a very torquey ~185hp 2.0 16v on standard induction due to the long stroke of these engines. They don't rev near as well as a Honda because of this, but they develop torque nicely and still go to high 7k rpm safely with a few tweaks

    Other option is KR or PL 1.9 conversion, if you want a better-revving setup.

    11-11.5 compression is the ultimate for a street 16v too.

    1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    5,745
    Quote Originally Posted by tassie_euro_mk1 View Post
    mmm maybe theyre not the go. I just thought they would of been a good alternative to the twin side draught webbers.

    ah well I have time to ponder these things. Thanks for the input guys. I appreciate it.

    I mean I was thinking of having an engine with power at around 170hp - 200hp???
    I'm building a 1.9 16v on twin 45 DCOEs. From what i've read and from talking to Techtonics Tuning, it should have about 200 or a bit more with the config i'm running.

    The thing you have to remember is, ATMO horsepower is made with RPMs.

    Horsepower is simply BMEP (brute mean effective pressure) times (x) RPM, so because you aren't filling the cylinder well to get a high BMEP, you have to rev the engine harder to produce more cycles in the same time span. That is why a forced induction engine will always have more torque.

    The other issue is, the higher in the RPM range the engine makes its power, the crankier it will be at low RPM, and it will be very dull down low.

    APR Tuned | KW Suspension | INA Engineering | Mocal Oil Control |
    Website: http://www.tprengineering.com
    Email: chris@tprengineering.com

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7,179
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by tassie_euro_mk1 View Post
    I mean I was thinking of having an engine with power at around 170hp - 200hp???
    that'd be easily accievable on a 16v on twin webers mate, just look at what Preens doing with his engine, that should put out over 200hp i recon
    VW: it aint just a car, its a way of life
    There are few things more satisfying in life than finding a solution to a problem and implementing it
    My Blog: tinkererstales.blogspot.com.au

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,059
    Users Country Flag
    My ABF that was in the blue Mk1 went really nicely with a good head, basic cams, extractors and a chip to suit. 112kW atw IIRC (will confirm tomorrow).

    1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,059
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by GoLfMan View Post
    that'd be easily accievable on a 16v on twin webers mate, just look at what Preens doing with his engine, that should put out over 200hp i recon

    150kW is a lot harder to come by than US dynos show, believe me!!

    1976 Project Carbon Mk1 - Sold! | 2015 Lotus Exige Cup | F80 M3 Family Wheels

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    5,745
    Quote Originally Posted by Valver. View Post
    150kW is a lot harder to come by than US dynos show, believe me!!
    Yeah thats very true. Also depends on the altitude its dyno'd at. Benny is getting new a wheel dyno in the new shop so when i get the donk done i'll tune it on there first up and get some figures, keeping in mind we're like 850m above sea level.

    The other thing is too, have you ever driven a car with anywhere near 200hp and less than 900kg?

    You're talking about a bloody fast street car. My mate has a 200hp atmo (2l pinto engine) Mk1 escort road registered race car, and it breaks traction in third gear at 50kmh with grooved Avons. It weighs about 900kg and its FAST. hits about 235 or a bit more into turn one at eastern creek, it's as quick as a modified EVO 7 in a straight line.

    Heck, my little 1.7 donk was a quick little engine, and it only had (i reckon) about 130hp.

    APR Tuned | KW Suspension | INA Engineering | Mocal Oil Control |
    Website: http://www.tprengineering.com
    Email: chris@tprengineering.com

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,440
    My mk1 with a stock kr with efi scared the cr ap out of me, i cant imagine even more power in it. One thing is for sure tho, it needs better brakes and i need bigger biceps to turn that steering!!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Australia?
    Posts
    6,035
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by peedman View Post
    and i need bigger biceps to turn that steering!!
    BUHAHAHAHA sorry but thats a classic call
    I'm soo euro even my missus is shaved...

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |