Support VWWC

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 89

Thread: Golf R - APR Stage II+

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    55
    Users Country Flag

    Golf R - APR Stage II+

    Well I took the leap about a week ago now and went the full APR Stage II+ ...
    • Replacement Exhaust and Downpipe
    • Replacement Intercooler
    • Exchange Fuel Pump
    • ECU Upgrade
    • Carbonio CAI and
    • Engine Mounts


    It takes a few days I think to bed down, when I picked it up last week I could feel it was quicker and the exhaust had an ominous growl...

    After a few days however everything just seems 'better, faster, stronger' - the take off is phenomenal and the exhaust noise is just so very sweet. Its a little noisier than stock, but not too much.

    Did the dyno yesterday and was managing 176kw @ the wheel, so with a 20-25% drive-train loss it makes for some pretty respectable figures. Mind you it was pretty warm and humid here (in Brisbane) yesterday, so it may go a little better in cooler, dryer conditions.



    I cant say enough good things about the excellent service from Guy and James @ Harding up here in Brisbane. They have an encyclopaedic knowledge of all things VAG and Porsche and they are more than happy to answer any questions. The guys around the corner @ Newman Avenue were great doing the dyno too.

    I have some pics, courtesy of James from HP of the installation and details























    Neil - Porsche 911 (997.2) Carrera S

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    blankedy
    Posts
    4,058
    Looks good. Those numbers look pretty average for an R with a few grand in kit, maybe I've been playing too much Gran Turismo... Any plans for a bigger turbo?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Hills District, Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    2,448
    Users Country Flag
    OK I need some help understanding why after a tune you get 176kw when i is supposed to be 188Kw stock.. anyway I will let the smart folk explain..
    Current Ride: MY 16 Daytona Pearl Grey Audi S3- Performance Pack 1, Sunroof and Driver assist

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Point Cook, Vic
    Posts
    5,191
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by noone View Post
    Looks good. Those numbers look pretty average for an R with a few grand in kit, maybe I've been playing too much Gran Turismo... Any plans for a bigger turbo?
    According to the quote below the figure is less than expected for a stage 1 golf R. Who knows though.. Dyno runs are difficult to compare. Ambient temp seems to be 22deg so doesnt really imply a super hot day unless the reading isnt correct which could be the source of a few kw loss due to an incorrect correction factor being applied.

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy_H View Post

    Golf R's with stage 1 have pulled around 180kw's wheel, and with the addition of a fuel pump (APR stage 1+) make around 188kw.

    PERFORMANCE, STYLING AND OEM PRODUCTS FOR YOUR VW

    FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by SilvrFoxX View Post
    OK I need some help understanding why after a tune you get 176kw when i is supposed to be 188Kw stock.. anyway I will let the smart folk explain..
    188Kw is a flywheel rating (engine dyno). The stock R would be much less at the wheels.
    Stage II and II+ is not about large peak increases over Stage I (or even really any peak increases), but increasing the width of the power band etc. So you can't expect much more over Stage I. Having said that, 176kw is lower than I'd have expected, but as Tim mentioned, dyno's have big variations on results (which makes them really only useful for before/after tests, or comparison of different cars on the same day) and if the ambient temp was incorrectly set then the results would be further wrong.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,333
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by SilvrFoxX View Post
    OK I need some help understanding why after a tune you get 176kw when i is supposed to be 188Kw stock.. anyway I will let the smart folk explain..
    Because once the lovely engine has produced the power its able to (a given, X) that maximum is created by the engine. By the time that same energy or power goes through the drivetrain, so gearboxes, diffs, moving parts etc. and finally goes through the hubs and into the wheels, there has been some energy lost moving all of these different parts.

    Once the power gets to the wheels, you then have to compensate again, for (some) loss of traction between the tyres and and the rollers on the dyno.

    So all of these moving parts and frictional surfaces create a different figure in power produced at the engine, and then the wheels.

    HUB Dynos, are dynos which require the taking off of the wheels from the car, and therefore suffers from less energy loss, and therefore more repeatable numbers. though, the give very inflated numbers

    (i.e. a MY09 WRX with a flash tune makes 205KW at the wheels/Hubs) where realistically it probably makes 175kws.. at the wheels..

    I believe a stock R makes around 150-155kws at the wheels..
    2010 MY11 GOLF R - 5DR | DSG | RISING BLUE | DYNAUDIO + ACC + BLUETOOTH + 19s + RNS510 |

    2017 MY17 TIGUAN HIGHLINE - 5DR | DSG | PEARL BLACK | SUNROOF + DAP |

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Hills District, Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    2,448
    Users Country Flag
    Thanks folk I get it now.. so the measure being provided by the manufacturer is at the fly not the wheels
    Current Ride: MY 16 Daytona Pearl Grey Audi S3- Performance Pack 1, Sunroof and Driver assist

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    832
    Users Country Flag
    That certainly seems low - for the $$, i'd have expected better numbers.

    At the mainline dyno day I attention (IIRC), there were Stage II and II+ TTS' doing 180-190KW at the wheels.

    And that was a stinking hot ****ty day. Guy was in attendance.
    2019 BMW M3 CS

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Witness Protection
    Posts
    728
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by elisiX View Post
    That certainly seems low
    The number of 175Kw at the wheels is only relevant when you have a valid number to compare it against, that is it is all relative. As Corey explained, the numbers become useful when they are taken on the same dyno in order to provide a comparison of before / after (oh, and for bull****ting at the pub afterwards).
    --------------------------

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag

    Yeah....

    In the end, I don't really care how many killerwasps a car has. "Real world" performance is what matters to me. Halojump's car may have measured 176 killerwasps on that dyno on that day, yet put a GPS performance computer in it, and it'll do 0 to 100 km/h in about 4.37 seconds! (based on Fab's car which is similarly configured. 4.37 seconds is quick in any language. HSV's with 300 killerwasps can't do that!

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |