100% correct Brad, we're a small aftermarket company competing against a major OE. Landed costs have increased around 30-40% this year but the OE must have hedged as they have not increased prices since the beginning of this year. Making the sale means skinny margins.
Cheers
George
06 Jetta 2.0TFSI Killed by a Lexus!
09 Eos 2.0TSI DSG Loved this car but has now gone to a new home!!
14 EOS 2.0 TSI has arrived!
The entire strategy of the Simos 18 (and 12) is to target Lambda 1 under all conditions - not seen before in VW / Audi land. A proper ECU tune richens it up based on a whole bunch of factors, and you also have all the component protection modes which effectively cool everything down at a certain level.
What we have seen with tuning boxes is they do not (because they can not) richen the mixture under any circumstances. If you run your vehicle on a dyno with the tuning box attached, you would probably remove it on the spot.
As a test - do that & report back!
There is this tech thread for further info:
New A3 / S3 3rd gen EA888 Engine tuning, Tuning boxes & Reflash tech discussion.
And here is an independent dyno of a tuning box (increasing boost but not richening the mixture) as an example.
![]()
Well that's a quick way to blast a hole through the side of a piston.
'07 Transporter 1.9 TDI
'01 Beetle 2.0
I see - Good to see a quantifying explanation. Thanks for that.
So in the case of a tuning box, the mixture will lean out when additional boost is introduced, eventually causing detonation, resulting in the ECU pulling timing. Am I on the right track?
After reading through the thread you posted, I'm wondering how the ECU manages to come so close to the targeted Lambada 1? It must use its smarts to dynamically adjust (based on a bunch of factors) to reach the target, even with the stock tune. Would it not adapt the same way when boost is increased artificially using a tuning box?
To clarify I'm not contradicting you, I'm just genuinely interested! Regardless you've got me convinced that a flash tune is the safer option, no doubt!
--Edit: Taking a stab in the dark after some further thought - does the OEM program not adjust fuelling at all, and only use OAR/trim to compensate the timing according to the environment/inputs? That would pose an obvious problem for a tuning box of course, not being able to bump up fuel to compensate. However if the OEM program is adjusting fuel there would be no issue. Not sure - please educate!![]()
Last edited by Primordial; 19-11-2015 at 08:50 PM.
There is no better settlement in a disagreement than pure and simple facts (and education), thanks Guy. Obviously the tune is better and safer for the car. Playing devils advocate for the moment, with a tuning box, what if the driver was easy on the car i.e no racing, no 0-62 sprints etc and just used the extra bit of torque (or boost) on the motorway, do you think this would have the same damaging effect?
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport - Super Select 2WD/4WD
Toyota 86 GTS Performance Pack Moon Slate - RWD
MINI Cooper S Clubman - FWD
Bookmarks