great0z: New information:
- Your tails have been modified!
- Your inner tail lights use a similar set-up as suggested by JBale (of VWVortex fame)
- The priority sequence of what I have called the "Alpha-pairs" in my paper needs further explanation (I think)
.
Response as follows:
Point (1) - Doesn't matter, but my previous suggestions don't apply!
Point (2) - I have to admit that I have never really understood the basis for JBale's tweak (no offense intended to Jeremy- he is a quite brilliant and very knowledgeable guy). The problem I have with the set-up is to do with the way that the AB alpha-pair is programmed. Your set-up assigns both the brake-light and the indicator function to the same alpha-pair. Here's my dilemma with this set-up; how does the car decide when resolving the conflict where both the brake and the indicator functions are energised at the same time? You might be aware that your compatriots with NAR models that have tried this configuration have complained of a delay in the operation of the inner tails compared with the outer lights. My personal hypothesis (which is totally speculative and entirely unproven) is that it's this intra-alpha pair conflict that causes this delay. But, clearly your set-up does work, so my concern is just of academic interest, rather than being a practical issue. Incidentally, if you have any information regarding tie-breaking rules for Leuchte channels within an alpha-pair, I'm all ears!!
Point (3) - I'm not sure how to say this tactfully, so I won't try! The work that I have done on Leuchte programming suggests that the priority sequence for the alpha-pairs is: Priority = GH> EF>CD>AB (i.e. the highest priority alpha-pair is GH and the lowest priority is AB). Based on my observation of how alpha-pairs interact and looking at your table, the priority of the three functions on your inner tails are: Parkers-first, followed by indicators and brake light (same priority) - but I don't think that this is what you wanted! In fact, I suspect that the order of functions in your set-up might help explain why your blinkers don't completely extinguish but instead, take-on the illumination level of the parkers (i.e. the parkers have the higher priority),
Finally, now that I know how your inner tail lights have been programmed, let me invite you to think about how you want the DRLs to integrate into the Indicator-Brake-Parker functions. By definition, the DRLs are (normally) fully illuminated whenever the rotary light switch is in the off position. This means (I think) that the inner tail lights (when used as DRLs) will be fully illuminated during daylight hours. More importantly, this also means that there will be no difference in the illumination of the inner tails when the brake lights are energised (during daylight hours) - is this what you want? Also, the placement of the DRL function in the priority order of the alpha-pairs will be important, else this function will override/conflict-with the indicators. For this reason, I think that it might be prudent to place the Brake and DRL functions into the same alpha pair (this is also handy because they also share the same illumination level) and to give this pair a lower priority to the indicator function. I also believe that the Parkers should have the lowest priority.
So, based on these accumulated suggestions, my proposal for the four lighting functions for the inner tails on you car is:Alpha pair AB - Parker set to 28% illumination
Alpha pair CD -Brake and DRLs set to 100% illumination (only noticeable difference between functions during night time when light switch NOT in off position)
Alpha pair EF- Dunkelphase
Alpha pair GH- Indicator (Hellphase)
Cheers
Don
PS: because of the same priority matters as discussed above you might want to also consider swapping the brake and parker functions in your 3rd brake-light table. Suggested pairings:Alpha pair AB - Parker set to 28% illumination
Alpha pair CD, or EF, or GH - Brake set to 100 % illumination
Bookmarks