The Official Mk7 Wheel Thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gregozedobe

As long as you stick to cosmetics that don't adversely affect function & safety why should they care ?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dutch77

Rego departments are staffed by public sector employees.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gregozedobe

Given that attitude I'm guessing you also think it is totally unfair when the police book you for doing something illegal/unsafe ;)

Rules are rules, if you break them then you should be prepared to live with the consequences. If you make mechanical mods to your car and then don't be surprised if the manufacturer decides to deny warranty coverage when something related to the mod breaks. "You have to pay to play"

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dutch77

That was a long bow to draw from a factual statement. ;)

I am all for police booking people doing something illegal and/or unsafe, it is not always their fault they have to enforce rules they disagree with. As for modding cars - I've always been one of the strongest advocates of paying to play.

So no disagreements there?

---

Thank you for your polite response, discussions usually go much better if they can remain civilised.

I responded in that manner because IMO you made a clear implication that "Rego departments" do object even though you are "stick{[ing} to cosmetics that don't adversely affect function & safety", purely because they "are staffed by public sector employees".

If that wasn't your intended meaning please clarify what you did mean ( I may need to apologise).

That led me to think that you have had experience with modifications that you thought were purely cosmetic but the people who apply the rules (rego and/or police) had reason to think these were mechanical changes, and that they affected safety/legality. These may have been changes such as lowered suspension and/or tyres/wheels in sizes/offset that were not approved by the vehicle manufacturer, or window tints that were darker than legal.

The "Pay to Play" principle I mentioned applies to fines (eg for unroadworthy offences), not just losing access to warranty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dutch77

Another set of OZ ST LMs.. still on my radar as possible options.

Attachment 31951

Attachment 31952

Attachment 31953

Attachment 31954

---

My choice if I did not get Prets

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gregozedobe

Thank you for your polite response, discussions usually go much better if they can remain civilised.

I responded in that manner because IMO you made a clear implication that "Rego departments" do object even though you are "stick{[ing} to cosmetics that don't adversely affect function & safety", purely because they "are staffed by public sector employees".

If that wasn't your intended meaning please clarify what you did mean ( I may need to apologise).

That led me to think that you have had experience with modifications that you thought were purely cosmetic but the people who apply the rules (rego and/or police) had reason to think these were mechanical changes, and that they affected safety/legality. These may have been changes such as lowered suspension and/or tyres/wheels in sizes/offset that were not approved by the vehicle manufacturer, or window tints that were darker than legal.

The "Pay to Play" principle I mentioned applies to fines (eg for unroadworthy offences), not just losing access to warranty.

---

I was actually just having a subtle dig at the public service in general, but in particular some of the drones who work in certain areas. It was me just being my usual offensive self being provocative and nothing actually intended - my hatred really only extends to the Left. ;)

As tempting as it would sometimes be to play outside the rules, well at least in a younger life, I don't have the funds to cover things like being in a mishap where insurance decided not to pay up (and I'm talking the sort of stuff that would not contribute to an incident, I certainly don't condone any stupid mods). Therefore any mods are by the book these days.. and haven't actually extended to even wheels since 2014 and the inception of this thread.

As a Canberran I assume you have an indirect, if not direct, interest in the public sector and so I doff my cap and say it's all in jest. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slin

My choice if I did not get Prets

---

Agreed - going the Wolf route and picking up the Prets has allowed me to defer an immediate wheel purchase.

For now. :P

Wednesday evening Beaker Bonus:

Attachment 31958

Attachment 31959

Attachment 31960

Attachment 31961

Attachment 31962

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dutch77

As a Canberran I assume you have an indirect, if not direct, interest in the public sector and so I doff my cap and say it's all in jest. :)

---

From my past experience Politicians (those people elected by electorates all over Australia) are much worse than public servants, and the career politicians are the best at dreaming up impractical crackpot schemes for wasting taxpayers money. However, their "Ministerial Advisers" are often worse still.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gregozedobe

From my past experience Politicians (those people elected by electorates all over Australia) are much worse than public servants, and the career politicians are the best at dreaming up impractical crackpot schemes for wasting taxpayers money. However, their "Ministerial Advisers" are often worse still.

---

Australians are very adept at voting in some shockers - but agreed, the 'advisers' are some interesting cats.

Anyway, I suppose as they say.. on with the Show. Thursday action:

Attachment 31963

Attachment 31964

Attachment 31965

Attachment 31966

Attachment 31967

Friday Five:

Attachment 31969

Attachment 31970

Attachment 31971

Attachment 31972

Attachment 31973

Neuspeed RSe05:

Attachment 31974

Attachment 31975

Attachment 31976

Rotiform LSR:

Attachment 31977