Wheels are FAR too big and also fugly.
The front and side look like a continuation of the way VW styled the 6R Polo from the MkVI Golf.
Interesting, don't know if it impacts the weights being thrown around (I assume not now that we have 'Australian' articles on the car now) but EU weights include a driver, unlike US/UK and I assume Aus weights.
Curb weight - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
Wheels are FAR too big and also fugly.
The front and side look like a continuation of the way VW styled the 6R Polo from the MkVI Golf.
Resident grumpy old fart
VW - Metallic Paint, Radial Tyres, Laminated Windscreen, Electric Windows, VW Alloy Wheels, Variable Geometry Exhaust Driven Supercharger, Direct Unit Fuel Injection, Adiabatic Ignition, MacPherson Struts front, Torsion Beam rear, Coil Springs, Hydraulic Dampers, Front Anti-Roll Bar, Disc Brakes, Bosch ECU, ABS
Just read the news on the home page....."Unladen weight: 1,351 kg (base version including driver [68 kg], luggage [7 kg] and 90 % filled fuel tank; calculated as per RL 92/21/EEC."
My current MK6 GTI (dsg version) is 1380KG (Tare Mass)
But in Australia, according to this website(http://www.ato.gov.au/corporate/cont...tm&page=11)for the Definition of tare mass:
"Tare mass
The mass of a vehicle (other than an L-group vehicle), that is all of the following:
- ready for service, unoccupied and unladen
- with all fluid reservoirs filled to nominal capacity except for fuel, which should be 10 litres only
- with all standard equipment and any options fitted."
Tare mass is also known as 'kerb mass' or 'unladen mass'.
(L-group vehicles include mopeds, motorcycles and motor tricycles as listed in the Australian Design Rules). "
So can I safely assume that the weight loss is more significant than first thought?
I'd like to add that the 0-100km time (6.5secs), according to the article, is for a manual. With a DSG, again, it should be safe to assume that the performance version should hit pretty close to the 6sec mark.
Last edited by jrgti; 01-03-2013 at 10:02 PM.
Plus we know VW to underquote the 0-100kph times
So I'm currently working in Singapore and just saw the first MKVII Golf on the road. Looked great, especially with the redesigned DRL's!
Polo GTI - 5 door - Candy White, Xenons, Comfort Package, Audio Upgrade, Bluetooth, Parking Sensors and Tint
Should be quicker, although VW seemed to claim the same time for both in mk6 guise. Real world testing did seem to net quicker times with the DSG though.
There's a sizeable difference now on the fuel usage front, both were at 7.7l/100km on the mk6; now they're talking 6.4l/100km for DSG and only 6.0l/100km for manual.. so something has definitely changed here.
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
New video released overnight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESYEnaNwkn0&sns=em
Well VW ads have to always be truthful, so those sounds must be real (not dubbed) and anyone must be able to slide that car on wet pavement.
Nav screen looked nice - wonder if that'll be the same with out maps.
Bookmarks