Support VWWC

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 73

Thread: MK7 Golf R versus...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    426

    A few wrong facts in that first article (eg it suggests the PP is 15mm lower than the normal GTI which it isn't - they're both 15mm lower than a std golf)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Sutherland Shire Sydney NSW
    Posts
    12
    Users Country Flag
    GTI or Golf R … or something else?
    A GTI or maybe an R has been on my mind for a while to replace my nice but un-exhilarating Comfortline FSI. We have a V6 CC my wife drives to work, which I really like. I like the refinement, its immediate smooth easy go, the heaps of features it has and good options. I want a new Golf or hatch to mirror the enjoyment I get from the CC. So I’ve been test driving:- a Merc A45 AMG; Merc A250; GTI, GTI-Performance; Golf R and an Audi S3, manual & DSG. In order of the drives: -

    ● Merc A45 AMG Auto (Fire breathing Dragon) – It’s quick and although it’s pricey, it has almost everything already standard equipment, even a sunroof, no options needed & circa $85K retail drive away. And in the boot it has its own compressor and tyre repair pack – which is confidence building for travelling at night, miles from anywhere – or not. With 3 on board, the suspension was very firm but at least it appeared to handle bumps without a severe jolt. Although there might be optional settings otherwise - I didn’t like the way some of the features worked, like the rear parking sensor lights don’t make a sound initially and you have to see them via the rear view mirror – bit hard when you want to look at the camera. Considering the dealership requires a $10,000 accident excess it was a worry. Anyway I digress.
    Everything about the A45 drive was harsh, and loud. Pushing the A45, the noise between 1st and 2nd sounded like the exhaust had fallen off – it, however was “popping” from the exhaust. My GTI driver son was with me too, (and for the next four drives) we both came to a similar conclusion – Way too harsh and loud for normal around town enjoyment, but an interesting car.

    ● A GTI with leather: hard to find one with fabric seats; I’m not a fan of the tartan. The GTI was ok, but strangely disappointing – probably because of my inflated expectations. We (2 up) drove around Botany, sounds like the same route as you WhiteJames. I was hoping for a little more refinement, I thought the road noise was fairly loud. Also the traction from front wheel drive is a concern for me, particularly getting away in the wet, although the GTI traction is pretty impressive, all things considered. The leather in this one felt quite stiff.

    ● An Audi S3 manual – Red with S Performance pack. Again with 4 up, but this car felt good. A little more refined than the previous cars too, although at low revs and full throttle (only something you’d get with a manual) it wasn’t always super sweet. I thought the manual was nice, but not for me, but it will be my son’s choice for him. The manual gearbox was super nice; (if only you could buy a DSG with a clutch to have real manual experiences now and then). The Audi doesn’t have the inclusions that VW typically has in their basic specs, like adaptive dampers (Magnetic ride), a backseat arm rest (Load through facility) auto hold (Hold assist) as on the CC and lots more), so some care is needed to make sure you get what you want. S3 demonstrators are hard to find, it took 4 days to arrange to drive this one.

    ● A GTI-Performance: from a different dealer, also with leather. I’m not sure why but with relatively normal driving I thought this was perhaps a little better than the GTI. With 4 up, only a little laggy, it still felt light and nimble, and still felt good and had reasonable go with all that load. Still somewhat harsher than I’d like, but I accept, this is not how most people would judge it. Set to Comfort suspension it wasn’t bad at all around town.

    ● Merc A250. Although overpriced it does have good inclusions and good options at good prices, e.g. leather is a lot cheaper than on the Golfs’. This drive was in the damp, so traction was very ordinary and a lot of fuss and bother with wheel spin and axle tramp. No subtle quick get-a-ways. The twin clutch auto is just not up to VW standard. It doesn’t get it right, slow changes, holding gears too long etc. It felt quite a bit slower than the GTI too, but may not be. For some drivers, this car could be a good choice, but not for me.

    ● Audi S3 DSG, Red with S Performance pack. This car took about a week to arrange and was trucked out from Audi Australia. My wife and I took this one for a longer drive. I used “Individual” with comfort settings for suspension and motor noise, but auto or sport for everything else. It was generally impressive, only a little lag, and the feel and power were very addictive; the Quattro means it just goes; no fuss, no bother. It may not have the characteristics that some car journo’s rave about, but for enjoyable driving in normal situations, it was good. Including going around suburban streets and even without exceeding speed limits (well not by much), the car felt really responsive, and even with just a little squirts – it was fun. Still, not up to the CC refinement and more road noise than I’d like. I don’t like the pops between gear changes with the DSG, (even if everyone else does) but there you go. The steering wheel is very thick, and might take a while to get used to. The ride is OK with the 18” wheels. The optional B&O sound system sounds good, it’ san $1150 option. I quite liked this car. I just needed to check my perceptions of it against the R when it arrives.

    ● Golf R with Leather – 3 up. Finally Saturday 12th release date and a test drive, but not before the sales manager extolled its virtues – the 6R was good but this one is on a whole new level, he said. Sitting in the R is nice and the blue sill and dash lighting is a nice touch. Immediately into the drive - with the salesperson driving quietly out of the street, I thought the interior noise was disturbing. It didn’t get any better, and with slow driving I really felt the coarseness and the noise resonating inside the cabin. Taking off hard but not flooring it, from an inside lane with traffic, the car was particularly laggy and reticent – still I’m sure this in not a real reflection – it was a very new 200 km on the clock car that maybe hasn’t learnt yet. I wasn’t as so aware of the ride negatives, not because they weren’t there, more because I was stunned that this car was no where near what I wanted it to be and didn’t try anymore: and I completely accept WhiteJames’s comments. The May “Wheels” summary might be about right. More - I couldn’t find any seat tilt adjustment, and all “7R”s come with tinted rear windows, like it or not. The 5.8” screen really looks small, and the 19” wheels? I like the S3’s 18”, thanks.


    Re the S3 versus a Golf - Price wise, the S3 is quite a bit dearer particularly when you add the options that generally VW supply as standard. But at least you do get good other good standard inclusions, which would bring the price of the R to a much closer figure – if you could option them on the R. This includes Nappa leather with electric adjustment including a seat tilt, but no memories, and a good quality large screen, with a nice rise action out of the dash (not a touch screen). If you get the $5000 S Performance Package it includes different quilted nappa leather S sport seats that loose the electric control, but still have a seat tilt.

    Immediately after the R test drive, I ordered the S3

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    171
    Users Country Flag
    WhiteJames, after driving it how do you think it compares to a GTI on 18's with no adaptive chassis control. My MK6 is a bumpy ride and I am considering upgrading to the R.

    Edit: Do you think the hard ride issue could be solved by putting some 18 inch wheels on it?
    Last edited by Ohmang; 19-04-2014 at 11:36 AM.
    - Golf 7 R DSG White -

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    730
    Thread Starter

    Golf R-v- Audi S3

    gandv's review is noteworthy as sometimes the forums can be dominated by the harder core types with the sole objective of posting great stats rather than the overall whole package as an ownership proposition. In addition to gandv's noteworthy review:

    I anticipate that the Manual Transmission Golf 7 R would be about 15-20 kgs lighter in the front end. Using the Golf GTI as an example: the front springs in the Manual Transmission Golf 7 R may be slightly softer, improving the ride comfort and throttle adjustability of the Golf 7 R with M-Trans. Wait and see I guess. I noted a similar thing between the M-Trans and DSG suspension tunes in the Golf 7 GTI, where the front springs in the M-Trans appear to be slightly softer, making the chassis a bit more fluid with added driver involvement. I'd still like to take the Golf 7 R on a Boat Shed run back to back with a Golf 7 GTI, as I think that the Golf 7 R may fare better around the hilly-tight-twisties on softer but better quality bitumen roadways.

    I understand that the M'Trans in all Golf variants: GTI, Golf R and Audi S3, have longer gearing. This may affect the turbo spooling response time re: turbo lag. The DSG in both the Golf 7 GTI and 7 R does a much better job of masking the turbo lag at low revs in higher gears.

    My sentiments are that the Golf 7 R, albeit a faster vehicle than the GTI, never felt that crisp or urgent in its responses compared to the lighter GTI. I think that gandv's review may of picked up on the fact that the Audi may feel more alert and crisp in it's acceleration and change of direction due to less weight, esp over the front end of the Audi S3 where most of the weight generally is. The Audi has alloy bonnet, front quarter panels, lower sub-frame and suspension strut cups I's told. The suspension in the Audi would therefore be tuned to reflect the lighter weight of the vehicle, while maintaining the same performance & agility as that of the Golf 7 R.

    The Golf 7 R is fast, but always feels sluggish, like it over-tyred compared to the lighter & more darty Golf 7 GTI. The GTI is carrying a higher level of overall grip levels due to its lighter weight, whereas the Golf 7 has a larger tyre footprint, stiffer chassis and AWD to aid grip levels, which would help in the wet, but in the dry I think the lighter weight wins out for driver feel and outright steady state grip levels, although not balance front to rear in the GTI.

    The added noise in the Golf 7 R comes from a combination of the larger diameter wheels & less tyre profile to a small degree, the shorter stiffer suspension more notably to a higher degree. I found that my VW Sports Driver Gear Springs in the MK6 GTI were providing the same tendency to add a bit of extra noise in their compression phase compared to the stock GTI springs.

    Ironically, I cannot help but feel that maybe Volkswagen saved on some sound deadening in the Golf 7 R to save weight, creating a bit of extra noise into the cabin, whereas Audi S3 has the luxury of using more expensive lighter alloys to save weight. It is apparent to me, without driving the Audi S3, that Volkswagen had only a certain budget to improve the Golf 7 R in respect to the performance -v- refinement equation. I may well be incorrect in assuming this, and Volkswagen may just be targeting the market that caters for the STI and EVO X crowd, but reviews of the Merc A45 AMG seem to be similar re: lack of refinement due to harder core performance.

    It is very difficult to get any Volkswagen on the older MKV and MK6 platform to ride well as the chassis wheelbase is shorter and the motor hangs out over the front further than the new Golf 7 MQB platform as the suspension tuning has to be firmer due to higher CoG of the smaller footprint. I had the opportunity to drive an early model Tiguan basic spec from Sutherland to City/Eastern Suburbs one day, and do the same route the other day in my Golf 7 GTI. The Golf 7 GTI on 18" wheels rode better than the Tiguan on small wheels and very large tyres … who would've guessed.

    This reflects the improvement in the Golf 7 range ride comfort, with exception of the Golf 7 R, which is a weapon for performance stats and AWD grip levels, but a notch or two backwards in ride comfort and cabin NVH. The new Golf 7 R will no doubt decimate the previous MK6 Golf R on any type of roadway or track and you can definitely feel that the Golf 7 R is lighter & better balanced than the outgoing MK6 R.

    The ride in the MK6 Golf GTI was always lumpy on rough roadways (with or without DCC) and did display incessant bobbing up and down with roadway patter, esp. on harder concrete roadways. The new Golf 7 GTI eliminated this MK6 trait, but the Golf 7 R reintroduces the patter in the quest for supreme suspension and chassis control.

    WJ
    Last edited by WhiteJames; 19-04-2014 at 02:19 PM.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    730
    Thread Starter
    WhiteJames, after driving it how do you think it compares to a GTI on 18's with no adaptive chassis control. My MK6 is a bumpy ride and I am considering upgrading to the R. Edit: Do you think the hard ride issue could be solved by putting some 18 inch wheels on it?
    I think that the Golf R is about the same or slightly less firm in terms of roadway patter i.e. bobbing up and down incessantly over small concrete waves & undulations … basically the secondary ride low speed compression damping. As stated before, the new MQB Golf 7 has made leaps & bounds in terms of improvement in the low speed secondary ride control due to larger chassis footprint and having the motor further rearwards in the chassis, requiring less aggressive damping/spring rates for a lower CoG imo.

    On bigger primary compression hits i.e. deeper concrete expansion joints between concrete slabs, the Golf 7 R is definitely firmer than the preceding MK6 Golf GTI (with or without DCC). The Golf 7 R is sort of heading towards a MKV/MK6 Golf GTI fitted with coil overs, excellent chassis body control with short & sharp responses to roadway crevices, divots, potholes & patchwork … a bit like a blood-hound ferreting dipping and diving into all the small dips & holes in the roadway. In this respect: The preceding MK6 Golf GTI sits between the new Golf 7 GTI and Golf 7 R for ride comfort around town imo … with the MK6 Golf GTI being closer to the Golf 7 R than the 7 GTI. The advantage of the Golf 7 R is that it is much more direct to the point that its a potent machine for raw speed and cornering, just a bit disconnected & anodyne in terms of outright driver feel. It's always difficult to mask excess weight in any machine.

    I seriously doubt that going down to 18" wheel/tyre combination will improve ride to any great degree. The 235mm tyre on the 19" wheel on the Golf 7 R does feel as if it gives a bit in cornering, rolling around the rim edges more than the 225mm tyre that is fitted to the GTI. I doubt 225mm on 18" wheel will provide any added ride comfort … most of the terse ride comfort is in the springs, dampers and sways bars on the Golf 7 R. The GTI - PP has to run much higher air pressure in the tyre apparently (41psi -v- 38psi) over the standard GTI. I imagine that a similar 18" tyre to the Std GTI with greater min load rating for the heavier Golf 7 R would be quite stiff (remember GTI carries 130kgs less on its tyres). Best to venture the Golf 7 R test drive on some rougher roadways … then drive the GTI-PP on the same route to satisfy yourself. If I was a travelling salesman driving around Sydney all-day every-day, I'd be going for the more comfort orientated GTI's.

    WJ
    Last edited by WhiteJames; 20-04-2014 at 08:30 AM.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    730
    Thread Starter
    For you hard-core types: be in no rush to pay top-dollar for a newly released Golf 7 R. Something better with Carbon Fibre awaits in the not to distant future:

    Volkswagen reveals Golf R400 mega-hatch | Autocar

    WJ

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Albury / Wodonga
    Posts
    366
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteJames View Post
    For you hard-core types: be in no rush to pay top-dollar for a newly released Golf 7 R. Something better with Carbon Fibre awaits in the not to distant future:

    Volkswagen reveals Golf R400 mega-hatch | Autocar

    WJ
    Very (pleasantly) surprised to see it has a manual transmission! Looks fantastic. Wonder how much it'll cost? I'll need to add $2000 to the price as I doubt Audi will give me my deposit back! I fear though it will be, dare I say it, too hard core for me.
    Looking for:- RS4 B7 Avant.
    Current:- Amarok V6 Sportline; Mazda CX-9 Azami AWD
    Previous - Mk 6 R manual; Mk 7 R manual; Passat 130 TDi Wagon. Mk 7.5 Wolfsburg Wagon.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    730
    Thread Starter

    ESC: Is the undefeatable ESC in the PP - GTI holding it back?

    Wheels Magazine (May 2014) suggest that the Golf 7 R does not feel as crisp or communicative in the driver’s hands as that of the Golf GTI – PP and that a well driven PP –GTI would have no drama keeping pace with a Golf 7 R in dry conditions around demanding roadways.

    Autoexpress.co.uk put the Seat Leon Cupra R –v- Golf 7 R around a short narrow closed track and find that the Seat Leon Cupra R is the faster and more engaging of the two, describing the Golf 7 R's lower speed change of direction as feeling 'lazy' … see autoexpress.co.uk video review:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tgdtVhQzJM

    Ironically: On a different day, autoexpress.co.uk also run a GTI – PP around the same track, albeit in manual form, and find that the GTI – PP clocks a time of about 0.16 sec slower than the Golf 7 R DSG. Interesting thing is that the tester reckons that he could go even quicker in the PP GTI if he could completely disable the ESC stability control. See autoexpress.co.uk video review of GTI – PP:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5hZwUuFX5A

    My question is: If that ESC was fully defeat able in the PP - GTI, would the PP – GTI clock a faster time than the Golf 7 R? It may well be possible on a short narrow track, perhaps not a faster flowing open track with long straights. Even then, Wheels Quarter mile test of the Golf 7 R and GTI – PP has the PP – GTI seriously gaining on the Golf 7 R by the 400 metre market in terms of speed.

    If I was to purchase the Golf 7 R, I’d be budgeting for a set of comforts/sports Koni FSD dampers to smooth out the ride comfort of the Golf R. Having DCC as standard fitment for the sports model Golf's makes adding aftermarket passive dampers that much more difficult as of lot of the DCC is intertwined with the driver’s central infortainment display. The standard Golf dampers are reasonable good for OE stuff, but the Koni FSD would another notch up for handing and quality feel as a premium aftermarket damper.

    The perplexing thing I find, as does Wheels Magazine and Auto Express (UK) Magazine, is that there is little benefit to be gained in performance of the Golf 7 R in relation to the degradation of ride comfort on the Golf 7 R. Given the cheaper price of the PP – GTI and that fact that many will not completely disable ESC stability for public roadway use, makes a convincing argument for the PP – GTI being the ‘Real McCoy’ as the ultimate Sports Golf.

    WJ
    Last edited by WhiteJames; 21-04-2014 at 02:42 PM.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    56
    Users Country Flag
    Or it would be, if it came in a manual.....

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    730
    Thread Starter

    Thermal Dynamics: GTI -v- R

    Appears that the PP - GTI and Audi S3 may be the two dark horses in the Volkswagen-Audi sports hatchback line-up, with the PP - GTI punching above its weight and the Audi S3 looking like it offers a better blend of refinement/performance mix than the coarser, rawer and more edgy Golf R.

    Here's a couple of reviews from car advice.com.au re: PP - GTI and Golf R.

    GTI - PP: 9.0/10
    R: 8.5/10


    PP - GTI
    Volkswagen Golf GTI Performance Review | CarAdvice

    Golf R
    2014 Volkswagen Golf R Review | CarAdvice

    Can't leave out the base model GTI Manual Trans version also with good reviews, this time from go auto.com:

    STD GTI
    2013 Volkswagen Golf GTI 5-dr hatch | GoAuto - Our Opinion

    Thermal Dynamics:

    I checked the oil temps towards the end of the Golf GTI -v- Golf R review around Mascot. The GTI was 109 degrees and the R was 110 degrees in oil temp. This was expected and is within the normal range of oil temps, as the Golf 7 second generation EA888 motor is designed to run with hotter oil temps to reduce internal friction loss … helps the motors rev cleaner and faster.

    WJ
    Last edited by WhiteJames; 24-04-2014 at 10:59 PM.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |