Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 115

Thread: Incorrect Speedometer - Golf mkVII?

  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Orange NSW
    Posts
    199
    Users Country Flag

    I was able to correct a significant amount out with VDSC in the instrument settings. The range was 1 to 7 and with the setting on 7, mine is about 2% optimistic. I haven't adjusted my wifes car yet, maybe I should make it much more optimistic by setting it to 1
    08 MY09 R32, DBP, DSG, GIAC, R8V10 reps, KW V3, RNS510/VIM/BT/MDI, region free DVD, switched Haldex, s2t paddles,HPA dogbone rubber,Mk7 climatronics, FIS+, Adams/RDA discs & Hawk pads, Garage button, GruppeM. Front fogs, Milltek. CF Chin spoiler.Strut support. LEDs Alloy front suspension bits.....
    http://photobucket.com/gregsr32

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    532
    Users Country Flag
    According to my Garmin my speedo shows 5km/h too much at 80,100,120 - so it doesn't stick to a % increase. It also indicates 100km after only doing a real 99km. All better than my Forester which is a consistent 7% out in the speedo but only 1.3% out on the odo.
    Nov '15 Polo 81TSI manual white

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    103
    Users Country Flag
    Thats digital speedometers for you. They can program how much of an offset they want at different speeds to maintain consistency!

    this message thrown at you from the window of my flying Golf!
    MY11 CW Golf RIntake, Tune, DP, DV+Superpro arms and ALKCustom 4" tipsTWM Short Shifter

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by a239947 View Post
    Thats digital speedometers for you. They can program how much of an offset they want at different speeds to maintain consistency!
    Aren't all speedos nowadays electronic? They can make the needle say what ever they want

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    103
    Users Country Flag
    Pretty much, not too many running a cable anymore!

    this message thrown at you from the window of my flying Golf!
    MY11 CW Golf RIntake, Tune, DP, DV+Superpro arms and ALKCustom 4" tipsTWM Short Shifter

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Condell Park, NSW
    Posts
    238
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by pologti18t View Post
    Aren't all speedos nowadays electronic? They can make the needle say what ever they want
    Indeed they can.. At the end of it all they're just counting voltage pulses of one form or another - one pulse for a given unit of distance (or more accurately, angle of wheel rotation) the rate of pulses per unit of time giving speed..

    Back to the ADR though, there is nothing that says the speedo *has* to be electronic - hence probably the very wide tolerance allowed not withstanding the fact the speedo can't under read... The ADR even specifies a temperature for testing (23șC IIRC) which would affect mechanical speedos (with drag cups, hair springs etc.) more than electronic ones.. Practically every car that has an engine management computer needs a digital speed input from somewhere so it makes sense that speedos be digital too..

    Personally, the only car I ever came across that was fuel injected with a mechanical speedo was the 3.0L VL Commodore (the one with the Nissan engine)... I'm sure there are others but when you consider the 5.0L V8 at the time was still carby fed you can kinda see why...

    - Anthony
    VW Tiguan 110TSI Life | Tungsten Silver

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    56
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountainman View Post
    According to my Garmin my speedo shows 5km/h too much at 80,100,120 - so it doesn't stick to a % increase. It also indicates 100km after only doing a real 99km. All better than my Forester which is a consistent 7% out in the speedo but only 1.3% out on the odo.
    Using GPS, my speedo overreads a consistent 5km/hr at all speeds, which is OK.
    I was surprised to see the ODO under read, albeit by a tiny amount (Golf trip said 99.0km, GPS said 99.75km, less than 1% error)
    2014 Mk7 GTI​|Pure White|Manual|Tint

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    14
    Users Country Flag
    I had a similar issue with my Mk6 103 TDI. I checked the indicated speed against a Tom Tom GPS.
    With the Mk6 I set the cruise to 125klm/h for 110 klm/hr speed limit & drove through the speed traps no problems over 3 years off hwy driving.
    With the Mk7 103 TSI its a bit less & the difference is greater at higher speeds.
    Cruise set to 67 for 60, 88 for 80, 110 for 100 & 123 for 110.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    532
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by martinnw View Post
    I had a similar issue with my Mk6 103 TDI. I checked the indicated speed against a Tom Tom GPS.
    With the Mk6 I set the cruise to 125klm/h for 110 klm/hr speed limit & drove through the speed traps no problems over 3 years off hwy driving.
    With the Mk7 103 TSI its a bit less & the difference is greater at higher speeds.
    Cruise set to 67 for 60, 88 for 80, 110 for 100 & 123 for 110.
    If I did that with mine I wouldn't have a license now. It is consistently 5km/h above the true speed. Indicating 125 is really 120 and in QLD we'd get booked for that in a 110 zone.
    Nov '15 Polo 81TSI manual white

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,591
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountainman View Post
    If I did that with mine I wouldn't have a license now. It is consistently 5km/h above the true speed. Indicating 125 is really 120 and in QLD we'd get booked for that in a 110 zone.
    That would be why you'd double check the true speed using at least one GPS rather than just taking blind advice from a forum.

    All our cars are different & the diameter of our tyres can vary markedly from brand-to -brand even if they are the same nominal size.

    Martinnw seems to be at the extreme end of innacuracy.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |