+1 on the looks. VW failed on the R front on Mk7, particularly given they specifically gave it more mongrel.
GTI PP Mk7
My grandma used to say...
+1 on the looks. VW failed on the R front on Mk7, particularly given they specifically gave it more mongrel.
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
What reliability issues issues were they referring to? The turbocharger? While there have been a number of reported failures of both stock and tuned R's I have read in various forums here and overseas, I didn't think there have been many reported failures in Australia. Haven't there been reported failures of GTI turbos as well, though perhaps a lesser number?
Mitsubishi Pajero Sport - Super Select 2WD/4WD
Toyota 86 GTS Performance Pack Moon Slate - RWD
MINI Cooper S Clubman - FWD
I find the front-end view compliments the rear and sides to give an all-round balanced, if not slightly conservative appearance, notwithstanding the 4 exhaust tailpipes and black diffuser, which gives the rear-end a more aggressive appearance. Is this the mongrel element you are referring to?
Which came to market first? The R or the R-line. Regardless, the VW marketing department are just trying to cash in on the R's appeal. Will the real R please step forward?
On the issue of the exhaust tailpipes, like many others, I was not a fan of 4 pipes for a 4-cylinder engine, but I've warmed to them now. I particularly like the oval design and the quality of the chrome finish. So I'm now a convert.
I was referring to the car generally.
The styling isn't offensive by any stretch, just a touch plain.
I agree the R-Line looks to similar to an R. In many respects it's no different to the other Germans - S-Line, M-Sport and AMG-enhanced options on the various models v the real deal models.. but I doubt many would mistake one of these for the true halo car, whereas I don't think there is enough visual difference on the R.
I have no issue with four pipes, but the cars with after market tips look markedly improved, and the R should have its Mk5/6 trademark centre pipes.
IMO, each to their own. As for Jap wheels..
--- FS: 2016 Golf GTI 40 years, white, DSG, 18,xxxkm -------------------------------------------------------------------
2019 Audi SQ5 | 2016 Golf GTI CS + OZ UL HLTs | Retired: 2018 Audi RS3 sportback + OZ Leggera HLTs
2017 Golf R Wolfsburg Sportwagen | 2016 BMW 340i + M-Performance tune/exhaust | 2015 Audi S3 sedan
2014 Golf GTI + OZ Leggera HLTs | 2012 Polo 77TSI (hers) | 2010 Golf GTI Stage 2 + OZ ST LMs
Driving the GTI PP and the R at the VW driving experience, the R really stood out for me with the extra power and grip. As mentioned previously, the axle tramp is annoying with the GTI PP (I do own one).
If budget is not a problem, then I would push for the R. I did see a black S3 sedan the other day and that looked the business too - very envious of you Dutch
I'm quoting the mechanics from a VW dealership I go to, plus he's my friend. He said in WA alone there has been at least 10 cases where the turbo blew, tuned or stock. In the drags 2 months back an R blew his turbo right in front of my eyes (he was tuned with APR stage 1) VW has fixed this issue by tweaking the turbo's propeller shaft which was causing the failure. the change started with cars made from November 2014.
Regarding the GTI turbos failing, yes I've heard that they too also fail, but not as many as the R
GTI PP Mk7
My grandma used to say...
Bookmarks