Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 55

Thread: 1.4L 118kw engine GONE

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,874

    Turbocharged Supercharged Intercooled is unfortunately not the correct abbreviation (although I sometimes wish it was). Even the Golf GTI is a TSI.

    The commonly suggested answer on the Internet is Turbo-Stratified Injection


    Perhaps there's also a longer unpronounceable German version as well just as DSG = Direct Shift Gearbox = a type of Doppelkupplungsgetriebe (Dual Clutch Gearbox)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Regional NSW
    Posts
    46
    Users Country Flag
    Well it's never pleasant to read that the manufacturer is ditching the engine you have in your car, but I won't be rushing to part with my 118 TSI DSG... in fact, even after reading that MkVI will be sans-118, I invested in the DQ200 upgrade from Guy Harding's joint in Coorparoo. Worth every cent, wish VW had programmed the 'box this way from the outset, the improvement is so noticeable. Love driving the car in city traffic again, and roundabouts no longer cause me to reach for the Xanax...
    09 Mk VI Golf 118TSI DSG United Grey + Sports Pack

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    792
    Users Country Flag
    what ever the reasons are for dropping the engine (we could debate it for weeks). some love it, some hate it, but a engine never last for ever. it may get tweeked and changed for years or scraped for a whole new design but eventually it gets killed. even the straight six from the falcon (alltough its origin goes back to the 60's) is a completed different engine to the first one. LS1's burned more oil then fuel. they replaced rings blocks and now it is so far from the first one it should be called somthing else but you can still get brand new crete engines under the LS1 banner when its just de-stroked LS2. its not a totally bad engine. it just has 2 things against it. 1. its not really for our conditions. 2. VGA are in denial and big changes will point out there flaws. So the pasist with ****y token attempts to silences and sweep it under the rug. the dream of great performance and even better economy is not a easy target. the idea was sound but they just missed the mark little.
    MY16 Candy white Octavia VRS Wagon, sunroof, 19" black pack, tech pack, comfort pack, auto tail gate
    MY12.5 Polo 6R GTI


  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    126
    Users Country Flag
    The local rag (The West Australian) reported today that the new engine line-up would include a 1.8L petrol version- didn't say that it would be a turbo though (ie from the Audi). Anyone know for sure? Also didn't say that Australia would get it...

    I have had no problems with my 118TSI engine and like driving it still (now 29000kms), but would quite like to upgrade to a mk 7 with that Audi engine.
    Golf VI GTI MY13 Candy white/ DSG/ Detroits/ tint/ reverse camera/ parking sensors
    2016 Skoda Octavia 162TSI RS Wagon (Silver/DSG/Tech pack/ Black pack)

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    421
    Users Country Flag
    After having test driven a few 2 litre turbos throughout this year, I am lamenting the demise of the twincharger. Let's face it, I spend 80% of my time in Sydney suburban stop-start traffic where the speed limits are 50km/h to 70km/h with a few 80 "freeways" (Gore Hill, Centenary Drive).

    My thoughts & reviews below only relate to suburban low speed driving, not track day driving nor out on the open roads.

    The supercharger gives that urgent kick in the back acceleration in the lower rpms at the lower speeds which the GTI and R don't give. I do stick to the speed limits, so by the time the turbo has spooled up in the GTI and R, I'm already at legal speeds. The twindercharger's torque is more immediate. I must admit I was disappointed with the GTI and R in this regard in terms of low rev responsiveness at low speeds.

    Of course, different story on the freeways where the GTI & R will totally eat my 1.4 litre in overtaking... but I'm in suburban streets & stop-start bumper to bumper traffic the far majority of my time.

    I test drove the A4 2 litre quattro yesterday and even though the torque kicks in sooner, I still didn't feel that same take off like the twincharger. The twincharger is the only forced induction engine I've driven that feels close to the Falcon's take off from stand still and why I love the engine.

    The 328i's dual vanos technology has some lag, but I do feel that take off sensation way sooner than in the GTI or R. It's not as immediate as the twincharger, but close to it. (Having said that, I do feel more low rev urgency in the Sirocco R at low speeds - presumably because it's lighter than the Golf R).

    So for around town pottering on congested Sydney suburban roads, I feel there's nothing like the twincharger. Even though they've dropped it from the Golf range, I hope it still lives on in some of the other models. I suspect it will eventually die out though through a phasing in of the 1.8 turbo.

    RIP twincharger!
    Skoda Octavia Mk3
    (sold) Golf Mark 6 Comfortline 118
    (sold) Golf Mark5 Comfortline Manual 2.0 FSI

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,874
    Could always fit an aftermarket supercharger to the Golf R if you've got the $$$$$

    ECU software upgrades supposedly help low down torque but you'd have to let someone who's got it tell you about that. I love the 1.4 twin for its noise, power, and fuel economy all wrapped up into a nice inconspicuous hatchback body.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Please Enter Location
    Posts
    11
    RIP twincharger! I thought the twin charger would live a lot longer...

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    406
    Users Country Flag

    1.4L 118kw engine GONE

    Rip twincharger. I will always love you. How on earth has Vw gotten more torque out their new 1.4? Without the supercharger?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    421
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Rawcpoppa View Post
    Rip twincharger. I will always love you. How on earth has Vw gotten more torque out their new 1.4? Without the supercharger?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Don't worry, I think in comparison to the twincharger the torque will either kick in higher up the rpm or will be laggy. The supercharger is near instanteous with the rich torque kicking in. Still makes me smile every time I floor it from 1500rpm no matter which gear I've selected.
    Skoda Octavia Mk3
    (sold) Golf Mark 6 Comfortline 118
    (sold) Golf Mark5 Comfortline Manual 2.0 FSI

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    406
    Users Country Flag

    1.4L 118kw engine GONE

    Quote Originally Posted by cktsi View Post
    Don't worry, I think in comparison to the twincharger the torque will either kick in higher up the rpm or will be laggy. The supercharger is near instanteous with the rich torque kicking in. Still makes me smile every time I floor it from 1500rpm no matter which gear I've selected.
    Well things have changed a bit definitely. Looking at the specs online the torque band is narrower apparently. Max torque from 1500-3500 on the new 1.4 vs 1500-4500 on the twincharger.

    It's also down on hp from 160 to 138 so it won't have as high a top end speed as the twincharger. 0-60 times are only off by 0.1 sec due to the golf 7 being lighter.

    I will miss the supercharger whine but I am not sure the public at large will realize much of a difference.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |