Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Volkswagen reveals Jetta for 2015MY

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    406
    Users Country Flag

    MQB doesn't govern whether it will be compact or not. Also the jetta uses the same pq35 platform as the golf 6 yet has a different wheelbase and sheet metal.

    Vw can easily use the MQB platform for the Jetta yet make it different from the Golf so no, interior space won't automatically suffer.

    The us jetta is cheaper because it left out ALOT of features. No independent rear suspension, no dq200 dsg, no parking sensors, leatherette instead of leather, cheaper polo electrical wiring, drum brakes, hard plastic dash. None of these things have anything to do with the platform. They simply decontented the us jetta.

    This is proven by looking at euro spec mk5 and 6 jettas. They are not decontented and share the same platform but have different sheet metal but are essentially the same in price.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    406
    Users Country Flag
    Here is a document describing MQB:

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...rm-Feb2012.pdf

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    260
    Users Country Flag
    I partially agree with what you said regarding US spec and Euro spec Jetta MK6's.

    However the MK5 Jetta in Australia was noticeably more expensive than the MK6. There was about a $6k drop in price between the two, and now the MK6 was dropped a further $6k, so in total it's about $12k cheaper than the MK5 Jetta was.

    The Euro spec MK6's are also cheaper inside vs the MK5. More hard plastics.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    South Australia
    Posts
    4,375
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Rawcpoppa View Post
    As in even before the mk7 Jetta launches?
    Yes I think as we have seen with the Polo, the new generation petrol/diesel engines will spread to the 2015 Jetta.

    Quote Originally Posted by ziggyboy View Post
    I believe part of the reason they didn't adopt Golf platforms was specifically for cost savings. The Jetta is primarily a cheaper car for the US market.

    Again it has a longer wheelbase so going MQB will reduce interior space. The Jetta is now a medium sized car. It will be compact class again if they used the MQB.
    MQB was only just released with the Mk7 Golf and was not ready in 2011 when the Jetta was launched. PQ35 would have been locked in 3 to 4 years prior [2007/08] for NCS Jetta, so to early to adopt MQB which would only been ink on paper internally.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rawcpoppa View Post
    MQB doesn't govern whether it will be compact or not. Also the jetta uses the same pq35 platform as the golf 6 yet has a different wheelbase and sheet metal.

    Vw can easily use the MQB platform for the Jetta yet make it different from the Golf so no, interior space won't automatically suffer.

    The us jetta is cheaper because it left out ALOT of features. No independent rear suspension, no dq200 dsg, no parking sensors, leatherette instead of leather, cheaper polo electrical wiring, drum brakes, hard plastic dash. None of these things have anything to do with the platform. They simply decontented the us jetta.

    This is proven by looking at euro spec mk5 and 6 jettas. They are not decontented and share the same platform but have different sheet metal but are essentially the same in price.
    For 2014MY NA spec Jetta now has rear disc brakes and Multilink Rear Suspension as standard. Which is big for the VW US crowd who thought this was a mistake to minus these features when the Jetta was launched in 2011. Even VWoA have said this may have been a step to far back.

    MQB will benefit the whole VW brand everything from the Polo to the CrossBlue will use MQB. As well as standardization of components such as sat nav/sound systems, the new engine series of EA288 (diesels) and EA211 (petrol) will be able to be used across hundreds of models. As will future tech like hybrids, electric cars to hydrogen vehicles have been considered for MQB.

    MQB plants will potentially be able to adapt to demand of the customer more efficiently to. For eg if the Golf was to stop production due to factory fault or strike etc in one MQB plant it could be adapted by another a lot easier with the MQB system. VW could potentially change from building a Polo one week to an SUV the next in the same factory. Of course component suppliers must be able to change just as quickly to.
    Last edited by phaeton; 16-04-2014 at 08:16 PM.
    - Ben

    1961 Karmann Ghia Coupé - 1993 Golf Cabriolet - 2006 Golf Comfortline 1.9L TDI
    2008 Jetta 2.0L FSI

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    11
    Users Country Flag
    Is it because the small compact cars segment is just gaining traction in the US compared to EU where the segment is mature enough to command premium and superior products?
    I'm definitely impressed with the efficient modular system (MQB, MLB and MSB) though. Others are at the moment playing catch-up.
    Hopefully we'll see an MQB-Jetta soon.

  6. #26

    Looks awesome..! Cool models.. thanks for sharing this link

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |