Support VWWC

Page 15 of 24 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 233

Thread: Tyre Options

  1. #141
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mitchelton, Qld
    Posts
    1,090

    Brad is yours a mk 2 or 3 and RS or non RS?

  2. #142
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,591
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by donweather View Post
    Brad is yours a mk 2 or 3 and RS or non RS?
    2007 build MK2 Elegance hatch. M6 1.8tsi, 138,000km. Bluefin tune since 50,000km; Eibach springs, koni yellows, vRS/GTI 312mm front brakes, other minor stuff.

    I've had 4 sets of wheels/tyres on it.
    16x6.5 ET50 + 205/55r16
    17x8.0 ET35 + 235/45r17
    16x7.5 ET50 + 225/55r16
    17x7.5 ET45 + 225/50r17
    Last edited by brad; 31-03-2015 at 07:43 AM.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  3. #143
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    60
    So have had the PS3's on for a few weeks now.

    They're quiet - and so far stopping and handling in the wet and dry has been good (haven't really pushed them too hard, but have had to make one or two quick stops, and they did well).

    However, accelerating relatively hard from a standing stop, particularly when turning, I'm getting a bit of wheel spin.. bit disappointed, I did get it on the stock tyres, but seems worse now.

  4. #144
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mitchelton, Qld
    Posts
    1,090
    Deeps, wheel spin or axle tramp? What's your occy model also?

  5. #145
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    60
    I think it's more axle tramp. Got the 118tsi 2012

    I remember about a month back i really floored it from a standing stop and got an almighty shudder. I thought it was the clutch, as it needs to be replaced, but now I'm thinking maybe that was axle tramp too.

  6. #146
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mitchelton, Qld
    Posts
    1,090
    Further to my post above regarding the Cades, will the ET42 have any issues with clashing with the RS brake calipers?

  7. #147
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,591
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by donweather View Post
    Further to my post above regarding the Cades, will the ET42 have any issues with clashing with the RS brake calipers?
    No. You can run 16" ET52 on the 312mm vRS brakes with about 6mm clearance.

    It would have to be a really poorly / weirdly made 17" or 18" to interfere with 312mm vRS brakes.
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  8. #148
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mitchelton, Qld
    Posts
    1,090
    Ok thanks Brad. With respect to your ET52 response isn't the clash with the brakes worse on a lower ET, say ET42?

  9. #149
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Erskineville, NSW
    Posts
    7,591
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by donweather View Post
    Ok thanks Brad. With respect to your ET52 response isn't the clash with the brakes worse on a lower ET, say ET42?
    All other dimensions being equal (ie: 17x7 rim) the ET50 offset has 15mm less outward poke (or is 15mm closer to the strut) than an ET35. If you change the width of the wheel then the offset distance changes even if the ET remains constant, so you have to consider both width & ET when working out where the wheel sits within the guards.

    Possibly this calculator will help visualise what I mean. It shows a strut & the outline of before & after different wheels, tyres, diameters, offsets, etc
    carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
    I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums

  10. #150
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Mitchelton, Qld
    Posts
    1,090

    Thanks Brad. But its not the clearance to the strut that's the problem. it's the clearance to the brake calipers which are closest to the inside surface of the rim and so with a lower ET you have less room between the intrados of the rim/spokes and the brake calipers.
    Last edited by donweather; 06-08-2014 at 12:19 PM.

Page 15 of 24 FirstFirst ... 51314151617 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |