Honestly. Having owned a MkV GTI and now owning my RS, no one could convince me the RS is a better drive. It is more practical, but it does not perform as well, or as charismatically. The GTI is a brilliant car, and from all reports, the MkVI is even better, if not dramatically.
Anyone who gets upset by an article like this needs to understand that the RS simply will never be as good as the GTI. In making it a family car with sporting abilities, compromises had to be made. Fact is, it is longer and heavier that the GTI which will change some of its handling abilities. It is also more softly suspended. It does not drive as well at 7/10ths, or above, as the GTI. That does not make it a bad car. It is immensely capable, amazingly practical and built better, albeit with less quality plastics.
In my opinion, it has better front end grip than the GTI up until the suspension is tested by any imperfections in the road. Then it feels a lot less composed. Advantage of the RS is that the car rides better around town and when travelling and it has bulk cargo space.
As the guy from mentone said, they arent direct competitors anyway, so stress not. It also is not as good as a Cayman S, but that is more apples and oranges. Dont confuse the existence of a hatch with eligibility for 'hot hatch' status.
I only sold my GTI for my family. I dont regret it, but there is a hole in my car life where the GTI was which can never be filled by the RS. I can say, however, that I could not go back to the limited space of the GTI after having the luxury of the Skoda's immense boot. I do want another GTI in a few years time, but as a secondary car.
The fact that the article says they feel similar, recognising they are in the same ball park, is a very flattering statement that any RS owner should take some pride in. Second place to the GTI is not bad.
Bookmarks