Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 83

Thread: Post ONLY Your Fuel Economy Figures

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    259
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by K1W1 View Post
    To stay sort of on topic. I downloaded an iPhobe App called Accufuel (cost all of $1.20 or so) which seems to have a nice interface for keeping fuel consumption records and it even shows L/100 Km if you want.
    Road Trip Lite does a similar job and is free.

    Sorry, off topic post.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    2,396
    Quote Originally Posted by samogonochka View Post
    well... i have diesel... hpw about getting around 2 litres per 100km i have proofs
    Before I accuse you of BS I'd like to see not only your "proofs" but a detailed description of vehicle, mods, distance covered, operating conditions and how the consumption was calculated (the figures the MFD claims can't be considered accurate as they are almost always optimistic, sometimes by up to 25% in the case of my Transporter).

    I have gotten some fabulous consumption figures on long downhill runs, and on the flat I can squeeze into the mid 4l/100km territory with my Transporter if I sit on 80kmh, unfortunately there is a very real chance of being rear-ended by an inattentive "cruise-controlller", so I don't do it these days (also it is extremely boring and takes way too long to get anywhere).

    In my Octavia I have way too much fun enjoying the acceleration and cornering it does so well to be worried about fuel consumption figures (mostly short trips around town, so usually in double figures, on trips it is a lot better).
    2017 MY18 Golf R 7.5 Wolfsburg wagon (boring white) delivered 21 Sep 2017, 2008 Octavia vRS wagon 2.0 TFSI 6M (bright yellow), 2006 T5 Transporter van 2.5 TDI 6M (gone but not forgotten).

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    382
    Quote Originally Posted by K1W1 View Post
    I was bored at the traffic lights so I tried a little experiment. I turned the AC off and watched the l/hr change. After trying it a couple of times I now know that it costs 40 cents/hour to run the AC (based on $1.20/lite for diesel).
    At 20,000km per year with an average speed of 60km/hr and having the AC on for 50% of the time it will cost you $66.00 or somewhere around 50 litres of fuel per year.

    That's today's fuel/cost saving tip.
    But But But... you haven't taken into account the extra deodorant one must buy to compensate for sitting in the traffic and sweating. Additionally, you havent taken into account the health care bills one would have to face as I have the window down and inhale the diesel fumes from the guy next too me.

    Wait it gets worse, now I turn up to a business meeting sweating and stinking like diesel and then lose credibility and business!! Think I would happily hand over the $66
    Gone...........R36 Icelandic Gray Wagon

    Specialising in off-topic discussion

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,981
    Quote Originally Posted by apom View Post
    But But But... you haven't taken into account the extra deodorant one must buy to compensate for sitting in the traffic and sweating. Additionally, you havent taken into account the health care bills one would have to face as I have the window down and inhale the diesel fumes from the guy next too me.

    Wait it gets worse, now I turn up to a business meeting sweating and stinking like diesel and then lose credibility and business!! Think I would happily hand over the $66
    Actually I know people are joking but I did.
    I assumed that the AC was only on 50% of the time. Maybe that 50% happens to be day time driving and the 50% with the AC off is night time. I guess I should also have qualified the original statement by saying that I live in Melbourne and often the heater is required not the AC.
    My Škoda photos here

    Flickr : Blog

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Coogee, NSW
    Posts
    9
    I was going down the hill - truth - around wollongong, but in 5th gear, with a/c on, foot off the pedal, and i was going around 80 in 60 zone.... i couldn't believe it myself, so i took number of pics of the display
    temperature was around 22, 2 people in the car... as i mentioned before i have octy 2008 since jan 2009, 1.9 TDI, manual, already done over 20K.
    the road wasn't just flat downhill, it was serpentine type, and do believe me as I enjoy my ride as well, quite often leaving other cars behind me (sometimes at costs of speeding fines ;-(





    Last edited by Transporter; 12-02-2010 at 03:55 PM. Reason: Delete dobled text.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Adelaide hills, SA
    Posts
    9,708
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by samogonochka View Post
    I was going down the hill - truth - around wollongong, but in 5th gear, with a/c on, foot off the pedal, and i was going around 80 in 60 zone.... i couldn't believe it myself, so i took number of pics of the display
    temperature was around 25, 2 people in the car... as i mentioned before i have octy 2008 since jan 2009, 1.9 TDI, manual, already done over 20K.
    the road wasn't just flat downhill, it was serpentine type, and do believe me as I enjoy my ride as well quite often leaving other cars behind me (at costs of speeding fines ;-(
    That somehow doesn't count.
    If, you would've switch A/C off your fuel consunmption down the hill and foot off the accelerator would be 0L/100km.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,981
    The pictures that you posted are all over a 2km distance.
    I too can get 2.6l/100km but imo a 5km run downhill run with a 300m drop in altitude from our house to the railway station doesn't really count as typical running. What is your average over a whole tank?
    My Škoda photos here

    Flickr : Blog

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Northfield, Adelaide
    Posts
    295
    Users Country Flag
    Bring up the No.2 "overall fuel consumption" page ( Top right corner it shows a 1, which resets every 2 hours if it's not being driven) The Number 2 page will give you an overall for the tank (if you rest the No.2 page at each refuel) or since you last manually reset it.

    This is what I quote my fuel figures off - is the No.2 page as it's a more accurate reflection of my true fuel consumption.

    Are people quoting their figures from the #1 or #2 readings?

    So Sam, what was your consumption reading for the 914km on the trip meter?? That will be more accurate then the downhill run
    Last edited by dazag; 12-02-2010 at 03:55 PM.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Coogee, NSW
    Posts
    9
    Boys - don't get too serious of course the true consumption is a bit higher - but that was first time when i had this reading, the minimum before was around 4l/100km... On average - if mostly driven on highway - its 5.5-5.8, but in city - its 6.5-6.8... quite often i drive with family behind - so car is full...

  10. #40

    Talking

    Oh, be nice to sam...err, whatever that name is...if we go by that logic I can claim the 6.7L/100kms my RS TSI (yes, note, TSI) achieved over a 60Km journey in only its second week of life. We will not mention that a good 6 odd kms of that was downhill under engine braking (0l/100kms), and the rest was at highway speeds. I just liked the almost-diesel-like look of that. Of course, the next day, I accelerated hard, and registered a journey of around 11l/100kms, but that too shall go unmentioned

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |