![Quote](https://www.vwwatercooled.com.au/forums/images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
mrichards
Hi everyone,
I'm interested in an Octavia Scout. I've not owned a diesel model before and have heard a variety of things from different quarters about owning/driving diesels in the city.
My wife drives a diesel Mondeo. Only had it 7,000km but no probs so far. Economy appears to be about 9L/100 but it mainly gets driven Hurstville/Ryde in peak hour.
We had a Captiva diesel a few years back which had DPF & it was never a problem in the 40,000km we had it. Economy was about 11L/100km after they did the reflash of the auto (9L/100 beforehand).
In particular, I am hearing doom and gloom about the diesel particulate filter and not driving the car enough for it to clean itself. I was also interested in the Forester Diesel and most of the nay-sayers were Subaru sales staff trying to steer me into a petrol model.
The diesel Subaru is pretty popular. It's on the Gov't fleet list. Maybe they were trying to steer you to petrol because the demand is on the diesels.
From real world experience, is there an issue with using a diesel as a daily driver where it may drive a 20-30 minute commute in the suburbs, other short drives to shops etc, and then stretch it's legs maybe once a week or a fortnight?
See above. It wasn't/isn't an issue for us.
Dum question/observation. The Scout is the 103kw? Therefore no DPF?
I like diesel as it gives much better economy. I am also not a fan of ethanol fuel and the fact that there is a phasing out of regular unleaded. OUr only othe option is premium which is mostly the same price as diesel.
If you buy a Petrol Subaru (or Skoda/VW for that matter), you should run them on PULP anyway, despite what the label says. Subarus are "detuned" to run on 91ron for tightarse Aussie that wont pay for PULP. Most likely, the cost per km on PULP will be equal or less than that of ULP. Most modern vehicles will show improvements in several areas using 95/98ron.
Also, I have heard that european models are difficult and expensive to maintain in terms of service and cost of parts. Is there any truth to this and are Skodas generally reliable and easy to keep?
I've had my car 3 years/75,000km. It's cost me about $500 per year, which I think is pretty reasonable. No worse than my mate spends on his Yaris.
I had a fuel pump problem early in ownership, a couple of other issues that the dealer claimed were "normal" and in the last few months a turbo control valve ($140), horn (still to be fixed) & in the torrential rain last week, a watery headlight.
carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums
Bookmarks