that site is very good as you can easily review the actual assessment, very handy..
I don't know if there will be one? was their talk of the possibility of no scout option? Kind of makes me feel better about just getting the soon to be old model scout, lol...Anyway, back on topic - the new Octavia does look pretty good. I wonder how the Scout version will scrub up.
I am very interested to see what their larger SUV is like too..
Last edited by joele; 29-11-2012 at 07:34 AM.
a computer generated image of what a Rapid RS could look like.
i prefer the look of the blue one.
imagine wat the new Octavia RS would look like!!!
Last edited by dArK5HaD0w; 29-11-2012 at 10:57 AM.
MY17 Superb 162TSI, Business Grey, Tech+Comfort Pack, APR ECU+TCU Stg 1, SLA, Rieger Splitter + Side Skirts, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs, Hardrace Swaybar, TPMS
It's a pretty well known fact that the Commodore Omega achieved 5 stars by the addition of a passenger seatbelt warning light. It was worth 1 point & got them over the line into a 5 star rating. While there were a number of engineering changes that were made that pushed the Commodore right to the edge of 4 stars, it was the passenger seat belt reminder that pushed the Omega into 5 star rating. It should be noted that a number of other models in the Commodore line-up didn't achieve 5 stars. Holden was keen to get the Omega into the 5 star rating because of fleet sales.
carandimage The place where Off-Topic is On-Topic
I used to think I was anal-retentive until I started getting involved in car forums
Thats fine, but you can compare on that site and see the actual crash results and many cars deserve 4 stars or 5 as the case may be. It is good to be able to see the actual crash ratings and results as you can see if there are real reasons for the lower star ratings and the two I mentioned (Vitara and Octavia) do have real safety shortfalls compared to most of their piers that warrant the lower star rating..
Sorry I should say the ratings as in 10 points out of 16 for front impact are based on REAL results not fluff, better? But these days everyone does the fluff (pretty much) so we are mostly left with the crash results.. The fluff only counts for 3 points out of 37, so will only pull up a car on the border..
EG compare ford modeo to Octavia
http://www.howsafeisyourcar.com.au/2...L-4cyl-Petrol/
http://www.howsafeisyourcar.com.au/2...-4cyl-TPetrol/
You can see that the mondeo deserved a higher star rating as no area of anyones body got a marginal rating in the mondeo... Even if you subtract the 2 points for the pole test it is still well ahead and scored far better on the frontal collision test..
So yes you can't automatically assume that a car did badly in the crash test based solely on the star score, but it is certainly a large contributing factor (again only 3 point of 37 points are for fluff) and should encourage the buyer to look at the TAC site and see what the crash results actually were.. In the case of the octavia I feel better about the 4 stars as it is only drivers knee possible damage compared to say my old 4 star civic that lost the points for mariginal chest protection for the driver (little more critical area).. Either way no marginal protection areas and a full five stars is a VALID selling point in my opinion, and something I imagine the new redesign will have..
Last edited by joele; 29-11-2012 at 01:34 PM.
[FONT=Franklin Gothic Medium]Matt
2015 Skoda Octavia RS | Combi | DSG | Metallic Grey | Tech Pack, Every Option Except Leather |
Prev: 2012 VW Polo GTI | 5dr | DSG | Reflex Silver | RCD510 |
is that the one from facebook?
Sure is! Octavia 3.
MY11 Octavia RS 2.0lt TSI DSG Liftback - Candy White
love the tail lights!
Bookmarks