Fuel tank volume

[Mi16 Man]

you have obviously got a subdued version of that Land Rover 'risk taking' gene

I have a Scotsman's gene so I only fill up when the price is at the low end of the cycle (hey it's a 25c /l difference in Adelaide).

Same here! 20c/L difference here in Newcastle. And with a middle name of 'MacFarlane' and driving a Kluger, I only fill up when it's cheap! Lol.....


MY13 Kluger KX-S AWD / MY16 Polo GTI

[bbcrowdog]

you have obviously got a subdued version of that Land Rover 'risk taking' gene

I have a Scotsman's gene so I only fill up when the price is at the low end of the cycle (hey it's a 25c /l difference in Adelaide).

Lol. I get a new car every 2-3 years and always run them to empty. Have always used BP ultimate and I've never had a problem.

[gadget007a]

One thing I haven't seen yet is the amount of fuel used. in my old Vectra it showed distance, range, fuel consumption (average and instantaneous) and fuel used (all on the one screen). maybe I'm not looking in the right place.

[brad]

One thing I haven't seen yet is the amount of fuel used. in my old Vectra it showed distance, range, fuel consumption (average and instantaneous) and fuel used (all on the one screen). maybe I'm not looking in the right place.

It doesn't show "Fuel Used". All the others are in the MFD.

[gadget007a]

It doesn't show "Fuel Used". All the others are in the MFD.

That's a pity I found that far more useful than range to empty as it was more accurate, even though it was a calculated value and not measured.

[Gerrycan]

What I don't get with Skoda and the Octavia range is why they bother to have two different fuel tanks fitted to the 4WD and 2WD versions and for such a small (5 litres) difference.
This is the company that saves money by not bothering to orientate the handbrake or bonnet release for RHD, or supply a plastic ice scraper to Australia.
Perhaps they are the same tank size and they just claim the 2WD is smaller to get a lazy 5kg weight reduction on the fuel load?

Anybody got any confirming evidence (or otherwise) of my small conspiracy theory?

[atzialis]

The only way to find out the real tank size would be to run the car out of petrol and then fill it up.

[brad]

What I don't get with Skoda and the Octavia range is why they bother to have two different fuel tanks fitted to the 4WD and 2WD versions and for such a small (5 litres) difference.
This is the company that saves money by not bothering to orientate the handbrake or bonnet release for RHD, or supply a plastic ice scraper to Australia.
Perhaps they are the same tank size and they just claim the 2WD is smaller to get a lazy 5kg weight reduction on the fuel load?

Anybody got any confirming evidence (or otherwise) of my small conspiracy theory?

I agree. Sometimes it looks like Skoda is running around picking up 20c pieces when $50 notes are flying around their head.

FWD fuel tank
Skoda Workshop Manuals > Octavia Mk2 > Drive unit > 1.9/77 kW TDI PD Engine > Fuel supply, gas operation > Removing and installing parts of the fuel supply system > Fuel tank with component parts (Octavia II)

AWD fuel tank
Skoda Workshop Manuals > Octavia Mk2 > Drive unit > 1.9/77 kW TDI PD Engine > Fuel supply, gas operation > Removing and installing parts of the fuel supply system > Fuel tank with component parts on four-wheel drive vehicles (Octavia II)

I think the FWD has a pancake muffler on the LHS?

[woofy]

You would think the extra 5L in the AWD might be due to it using a bit more fuel so they put it in to compensate. Pity they didn't just use it for the normal model, but yeah it could purely be to lighten the car by 5kgish of fuel for official specs so it looks better.

[atzialis]

Aren't car weights specified dry. So tank capacity wouldn't come into it. Except for the extra material used to make the tank physically larger.

Sent from my GT-I9195 using Tapatalk