Threaded View

Lucas_R 98 all the way. 30-01-2016,
11:01 PM

afterdarker Petrol is so cheap at the... 30-01-2016,
11:54 PM

ddizzle Thanks for the repies. As... 31-01-2016,
11:10 AM

Gerrycan The Manufacturer's... 01-02-2016,
08:52 AM

dArK5HaD0w on the mk2 vRS, the fuel cap... 01-02-2016,
09:02 AM

woofy I guess the engine has... 01-02-2016,
01:20 PM

Gerrycan A few random thoughts:
I... 01-02-2016,
03:42 PM

Tuan Doesn't answer all the... 02-02-2016,
08:59 AM

Gerrycan I am afraid that article is... 02-02-2016,
11:10 AM

Gerrycan I have heard repeated... 03-02-2016,
02:19 PM

Tigger I always use 98 fuel, and... 14-02-2016,
06:57 AM

Gerrycan I don't know if it is but... 14-02-2016,
09:45 PM

woofy Yeah it was the cleaning... 18-02-2016,
02:34 PM

Jondalar With my Pajero I've always... 18-02-2016,
05:38 PM
-
A few random thoughts:
I think the new Ford Focus Ecotec 1.6 turbo and the Hyundai new turbo ranges are designed for US low quality fuel and they claim quite high outputs and are able to run on 91 Octane. Goodness knows how they do that.
Apparently all Australian official fuel consumption tests are required to be run on 95 Octane (not sure what is done with regards to those cars requiring 98 Octane?).
Finally, I have yet to see a properly run test that proves there is substantially better performance running an unnecessarily high octane.
I am excluding those dyno tests for tuned engines.
I remember the old Shell tv adverts of my Pommie youth where car "A" with Shell always ran 5+ mpg better than car "B" with the competitors product. The advertising focus now is more on the better detergents in the higher grades will keep your engine running cleaner/better/more economically. Might be something to do with more truth in advertising required these days (Fatblaster apart)?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks