A lot of reasonable comments. It is, as others have said, ultimately their word against yours - unless you can provide a bit of weight to your side of the argument, and the only way to that is with an independent inspection. I agree that not returning all of the parts could work in your favour. The engineer's report would perhaps be technically inconclusive, but his/her comments after the technobabble won't reflect well on not being given the material required for him/her to effectively do the job they were given. The RACV can also advise on the consumer rights side of things without going to Consumer Rights Victoria in the first insurance. You could always do that later. Slowly, slowly, step by step. If the dealer sees that you're serious about following this through then they may become a bit more willing to come to the party, rather than go through a lot of hassle. I only said, "may", but that is unquestionably better than the straight out "No" that you're getting now.
While you can't prove a direct correlation, Skoda Octy IIs have form in this area. Google "Skoda clutch failures" and you might be surprised. Perhaps something else that the dealer mightn't want to get into a lengthy discussion with the RACV and CRV about. There was even a UK recall of the dual mass flywheels,
Recall Ref: R/2006/035
Exact Model: Octavia II
Description: Flywheel may fail resulting in fire
VIN:
Build Date:
Numbers: 1687
Defect: It has been identified that the two mass flywheels can become damaged because of a not optimally aligned through-flow restrictor in the clutch pressure pipe. This situation can lead to total failure of the flywheel and under unfavourable conditions a fire.
Action: Recalled vehicles will have the make of the two mass flywheels identified and if necessary, replaced together with the breather of the clutch pressure pipe.
Launch Date: 19 April 2006.
It's not recent, but it does establish a history of a problem that can be attributed to the car, not the driver. Your best way to achieve a result may be to be a polite, but complete and utter pain in the you know what. "Look, I see what you're saying, but if I agree with you, well, I think that then we'd both be wrong, so I'll go and have a chat with an RACV engineer, the RACV consumer advice people, and maybe even Consumer Rights Victoria to see where they all think that I stand before getting back to you. Unless, of course they contact you first, in which case would you mind giving me a bell? Thanks." The dealer may come to realise that if you are serious in following through, and are not going to relent, then it might be in their own best interests to fix the car than continue to put up with you. Even if they offer to split the bill, or pay for the parts, something is better than nothing. At this stage of the proceedings I really don't think that you've got anything to lose.
Bookmarks